2006
DOI: 10.1207/s15327930pje8104_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrowing in on Educational Resources That Do Affect Student Achievement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
1
8

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
46
1
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Archibald (2006) examined resources influencing student achievement and found that school size had a negatively significant effect on reading and mathematics. Andrews, Duncombe, and Yinger (2002) reviewed the literature on educational expenditures and suggested that there might be a school size at which the student achievement would become negatively affected.…”
Section: School Characteristics Influencing Science Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Archibald (2006) examined resources influencing student achievement and found that school size had a negatively significant effect on reading and mathematics. Andrews, Duncombe, and Yinger (2002) reviewed the literature on educational expenditures and suggested that there might be a school size at which the student achievement would become negatively affected.…”
Section: School Characteristics Influencing Science Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Andrews, Duncombe, and Yinger (2002) reviewed the literature on educational expenditures and suggested that there might be a school size at which the student achievement would become negatively affected. Archibald (2006) used multilevel modeling to examine resources affecting student achievement and found that student background characteristics mattered not only at the student-level but for the school-level as well. The contextual effect was strongest for school-level poverty and affected both reading and mathematics achievement, which might be due to the concentration of poverty at certain schools.…”
Section: School Characteristics Influencing Science Achievementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some research (Hanushek, 1986;Hanushek, 1989;Okpala, Okpala, & Smith, 2001) concluded that there was no relationship between expenditures and achievement, Ismail and Cheng (2005) have argued that the results from Hanushek (1986Hanushek ( , 1989 were based on poor data and inappropriate methodology. Archibald (2006) found positive effects of per-pupil expenditures on reading achievement throughout primary and secondary education, while Eide and Showalter (1998) used quantile regression to show that per-pupil expenditures are important for the tail end of the performance distribution, in other words, students at the lowest end of test score distributions benefit significantly from greater expenditures. Finally, expenditures may act as an endogenous variable to performance, or may have a mediating (indirect) effect through greater access to effective teachers, more successful pedagogy, and a reduction in class size (Wenglinsky, 1997;Elliot, 1998;Sander, 1999).…”
Section: Pupil-teacher Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Researchers over the years have maintained that teachers form a strong causal factor in defining the quality of education in schools (Archibald, 2006;Darling-Hammond & BaratzSnowden, 2005;Golla, de Guzman, Ogena, & Brawner, 1998;Hake, 1998). Teachers see to it that students have acquired creative and critical thinking abilities ready to face the realities of life.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%