2021
DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000007967
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrowing and Operated Appearance of the Middle Nasal Third after Hump Resection without Middle Vault Reconstruction

Abstract: reserving a natural appearance of the nasal dorsum after a profile reduction continues to be a challenge. The well-understood deformities contributing to an undesirable postoperative appearance of the resected dorsum are narrowing, irregularities, and depressions of the nasal sidewall, resulting in the shape of an inverted V. These deformities result from disruption of the attachments between the upper lateral cartilages and the dorsal septum. 1-3 More than six decades ago, the push-down technique was describe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nasal bone length is also an important consideration, as shorter bones are associated with longer upper lateral cartilage and a greater risk for collapse. 71,75 325e…”
Section: Dorsal Humpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nasal bone length is also an important consideration, as shorter bones are associated with longer upper lateral cartilage and a greater risk for collapse. 71,75 325e…”
Section: Dorsal Humpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…69,70 However, there is no differences in the incidence of inverted-V deformities. 71 Preservation techniques maintain an intact dorsal roof by resecting the septum in conjunction with osteotomies. The push-down technique is indicated for humps smaller than 4 mm.…”
Section: Dorsal Humpmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…T he article entitled "Narrowing and Operated Appearance of the Middle Nasal Third after Hump Resection without Middle Vault Reconstruction" takes a look at a very important question that many rhinoplasty surgeons have commented on over the years. 1 In the study, the authors followed 22 patients who underwent composite hump reduction and 25 patients who underwent component hump reduction. The length of follow-up ranged from 12 to 96 months (median, 35 months) for the composite hump reduction group and 12 to 56 months (median, 22 months) for the component hump reduction group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%