2000
DOI: 10.1007/pl00008360
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrow- versus broad-spectrum parenteral antimicrobials against common infections of childhood: a prospective and randomised comparison between penicillin and cefuroxime

Abstract: Procaine penicillin is as effective and safe as cefuroxime for common community-acquired infections in immunocompetent children.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
14
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…There were no differences in outcomes (time to recovery, normalization of laboratory parameters, or treatment failure) between the 2 antibiotic treatment groups. 20 These small trials were conducted in regions with relatively low rates of pneumococcal resistance to penicillins compared with the United States or were not limited to CAP. Thus, their findings may not be directly applicable to children hospitalized with CAP in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were no differences in outcomes (time to recovery, normalization of laboratory parameters, or treatment failure) between the 2 antibiotic treatment groups. 20 These small trials were conducted in regions with relatively low rates of pneumococcal resistance to penicillins compared with the United States or were not limited to CAP. Thus, their findings may not be directly applicable to children hospitalized with CAP in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[II] 63 [II] 147 [II] 148 [II] 149 [II] 150 [II] 151 [II] 152 [II] Additionally, newer antibiotics such as levofloxacin153 [II] have shown efficacy in similar studies in the USA. Despite pharmacological differences in oral cephalosporins (cefaclor has an association with skin reactions but, compared with cefalexin, good activity against S pyogenes and S pneumoniae ; cefixime is poorly active against S aureus and cefuroxime axetil has poor oral absorption), no differences in clinical efficacy have been identified.…”
Section: Antibiotic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[II] All are from developing countries, except for a trial from Finland which randomised children with pneumonia (a high proportion of which had a bacterial cause) to either 4 or 7 days of parenteral penicillin or cefuroxime, with no difference in outcome 150. [Ib] …”
Section: Antibiotic Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a consequence, many unnecessary courses of such agents are administered to children with pneumonia, even though parenteral penicillin would usually suffice, especially if used in increased doses [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%