1997
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb02391.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NARROW HYBRID ZONE BETWEEN TWO SUBSPECIES OF BIG SAGEBRUSH (ARTEMISIA TRIDENTATA: ASTERACEAE). IV. RECIPROCAL TRANSPLANT EXPERIMENTS

Abstract: Does endogenous or exogenous selection stabilize the big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) hybrid zone? After two years of study, our reciprocal transplant experiments showed significant genotype by environment interactions for a number of fitness components, including germination, growth, and reproduction. Hybrids were the most fit within the hybrid garden. In the parental gardens, the native parental taxon was more fit than either the alien parental or hybrids. These results are consistent with the bounded hy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
132
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
3
132
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, both favorable and unfavorable cytonuclear interactions have been shown in Iris hybrids to contribute to short-term survival in the greenhouse (Burke et al 1998). Environment-dependent selection has been suggested by other reciprocal transplant studies, for example, in an Artemisia hybrid zone where there is evidence for adaptation of the parental types to their own habitat (Wang et al 1997). Our results are novel because they demonstrate asymmetric effects on fitness of hybrids under natural, rather than greenhouse, conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, both favorable and unfavorable cytonuclear interactions have been shown in Iris hybrids to contribute to short-term survival in the greenhouse (Burke et al 1998). Environment-dependent selection has been suggested by other reciprocal transplant studies, for example, in an Artemisia hybrid zone where there is evidence for adaptation of the parental types to their own habitat (Wang et al 1997). Our results are novel because they demonstrate asymmetric effects on fitness of hybrids under natural, rather than greenhouse, conditions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…This gap is all the more surprising given that natural hybridization is so common in flowering plants. Renewed interest in plant hybridization has recently generated a few reciprocal transplant studies in natural hybrid zones (Levin and Schmidt 1985;Wang et al 1997). Renewed interest in plant hybridization has recently generated a few reciprocal transplant studies in natural hybrid zones (Levin and Schmidt 1985;Wang et al 1997).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These consequences can include a stable hybrid zone, disappearance or reinforcement of species differences, or production of a new hybrid species (Arnold, 1997). Only recently has variation in physiological performance been examined in natural hybrid systems (Wang et al, 1997;Johnston et al, 2001;Schwarzbach et al, 2001;Ludwig et al, 2004). Only recently has variation in physiological performance been examined in natural hybrid systems (Wang et al, 1997;Johnston et al, 2001;Schwarzbach et al, 2001;Ludwig et al, 2004).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although reduced hybrid fitness relative to pure-species types is common (reviewed in Barton and Hewitt 1989;Howard 1993), hybridization can sometimes be beneficial (reviewed in Arnold and Hodges 1995;Arnold 1997; see also Semlitsch and Reyer 1992;Semlitsch 1993;Burke et al 1998;Parris 1999Parris , 2001aVeen et al 2001). Moreover, the fitness consequences of hybridization may vary across environments or fitness components (Semlitsch and Reyer 1992;Emms and Arnold 1997;Wang et al 1997;Burke et al 1998;Pearson 2000;Parris 2001a,b). For instance, hybrids may outperform pure-species types early in ontogeny but may suffer lower fecundity as adults (e.g., Simovich 1985;Simovich et al 1991;Parris et al 1999).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%