1982
DOI: 10.2214/ajr.138.6.1143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrow gauge needle aspiration of solid adrenal masses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
4

Year Published

1983
1983
2009
2009

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The biopsy technique has been described [3,4]. This technique left adrenal masses were approached posteriorly ( fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The biopsy technique has been described [3,4]. This technique left adrenal masses were approached posteriorly ( fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary indication for adrenal FNA is for diagnostic evaluation of suspected metastatic disease in patients with a history of extra adrenal malignancy presenting with a nonfunctional adrenal mass that exhibits equivocal imaging characteristics [1,39,40]. In this context, aspiration cytology is quite effective, with reported sensitivity rates generally exceeding 80% and specificity rates approaching 100% for the detection of malignancy [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48]. Other accepted indications for FNA of the adrenal gland include evaluation of suspected infectious processes or lymphoma involving the adrenal because a positive diagnosis in these settings would have important therapeutic implications [39].…”
Section: Fine Needle Aspiration and Core Needle Biopsymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The complication could be avoidable if a transhepatic approach was used in biopsies of right adrenal tumors (Bernardino et al 1985). Although hemorrhage has been noted in some adrenal biopsies, it is not a significant complication (Heaston et al 1982;Bernardino et al 1985). There was no statistical correlation noted between the biopsy route and hemorrhage, or between needle size and change in hematocrit (Bernardino et al 1985).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%