2008
DOI: 10.1080/17524030801980242
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narratives, Rhetorical Genres, and Environmental Conflict: Responses to Schwarze's “Environmental Melodrama”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though comedy unifies communities and promotes possibilities, it may do so by appealing to hegemonic values rather than, for instance, fundamentally challenging the neo-liberal logic which justifies exploitation of the earth (Kinsella, 2008). Comic fluidity must not be taken as an excuse to justify doing nothing about global warming, or to maintain the status quo.…”
Section: Conclusion: Understanding and Reframing Apocalyptic Despairmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Though comedy unifies communities and promotes possibilities, it may do so by appealing to hegemonic values rather than, for instance, fundamentally challenging the neo-liberal logic which justifies exploitation of the earth (Kinsella, 2008). Comic fluidity must not be taken as an excuse to justify doing nothing about global warming, or to maintain the status quo.…”
Section: Conclusion: Understanding and Reframing Apocalyptic Despairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps the polarizing rhetoric of melodrama may shift the ground of the climate change debate away from economic costs and benefits, to the moral stakes of decimating the earth, as Peterson suggests (Kinsella, 2008). Drawing clear distinctions between heroes and villains could motivate identifications to mitigate emissions.…”
Section: Conclusion: Understanding and Reframing Apocalyptic Despairmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the criticism of melodrama as irrational, it represents how people understand and come to terms with complex and daunting issues such as climate change. 2 In other words, people tend to make sense of complex issues by categorizing the good and the evil and identifying heroes and villains. Instead of ignoring or repudiating melodrama, proponents of climate change mitigation technology and policy have much to gain by adapting a melodramatic frame for their purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some scholars have criticized melodrama for its polarizing perspective, [4][5][6] it remains a dominant way for people to understand and come to terms with complex and daunting issues. 2 During the 1980s, many scientists and policymakers subscribed to a view of science communication that assumed members of the lay public suff ered from a defi cit of information, as well as a defi cit in the way that they viewed the world. According to the defi cit model, good science communication simply needed to fi ll the void with correct information, and with training in how to view the world more rationally.…”
Section: Melodramamentioning
confidence: 99%