Narratives of Sexual Consent and Coercion: Forced Prostitution Trials in Progressive-Era New York City

Abstract

This article analyzes testimony about forced prostitution voiced in New York City's Court of General Sessions from 1908 to 1915. During these years, the problem of coercive prostitution—commonly called “white slavery”—received an unprecedented amount of attention from journalists, politicians, and antivice activists. Drawing from verbatim transcripts of compulsory‐prostitution trials, our research examines the relationship between cultural narratives and courtroom storytelling. We show how the white slavery narrative in popular culture oriented prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, and jurors in prostitution trials. Extending the account of social control in the sociological literature on antivice activism, our analysis shows that the prosecution of forced prostitution was not simply a top‐down exercise of juridical power. Using insights from conversation analysis and cultural history, an examination of compulsory‐prostitution cases reveals a quadripartite storytelling process where judges and jurors—with different orientations to the white slavery narrative—played a constitutive role in how the defense and prosecution argued their cases.

Linguistic Indicators of Coercive Control: Evidenced in Sex Trafficking Narratives

“…The TVPA of 2000, as well as its re-authorizations in 2003, 2005, 2008, 2013, and 2017, defines sex trafficking as any means to use a person for purposes of CSE, which includes elementary means of obtaining and retaining slaves, such as kidnapping and force (U.S. Department of State 2000). In addition to force or fraud, the TVPA specifies that the use of coercion can also be used to legally identify whether sex trafficking has occurred and indeed, the use of coercion appears to be equally if not more widespread than the consistent use of force and threats (Baldwin et al 2014;Donovan and Barnes-Brus 2011;Stark 2009Stark , 2012. * Not only may coercive control be more ''cost-effective'' in controlling the women, enforcing implicit methods to obtain individuals for the purpose of trafficking appears to be more psychologically gratifying for those in control (Reid 2016).…”

“I'll Make Them Shoot Me”: Accounts of Death Row Prisoners Advocating for Execution

“…Sociolegal studies of courtroom narrative have generally analyzed verbal exchanges (Donovan and Barnes‐Brus ), the role of larger cultural scripts (Donovan and Barnes‐Brus ; Fleury‐Steiner ; Umphrey ), the impact of laws and legal rules (Ewick and Silbey ; Fraiden ), and the disposition of individual judges (Lens ). Less common are studies that include in their analysis dynamics of the legal process.…”