2004
DOI: 10.4135/9781849209502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narratives in Social Science Research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
1,143
0
89

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,529 publications
(1,239 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
7
1,143
0
89
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even though much research has been conducted to show how 'stories can serve as means to provide legitimacy for organizational changes that might otherwise have been considered illegitimate, irrational or unnecessary' (Rhodes and Brown, 2005a, p. 173), less attention has been paid to their implications for organizational ethics (for exceptions see Humphreys and Brown, 2008;Kornberger and Brown, 2007;Rhodes and Brown, 2005b). Whilst there is a well-established literature on organizational storytelling (see Boje, 2001;Czarniawska, 1997Czarniawska, , 2004Gabriel, 2000;Rhodes and Brown, 2005a) and its relation to organizational change (Doolin, 2003;Feldman, 1990;Brown and Humphreys, 2003;Skoldberg, 1994;Stevenson and Greenberg, 1998) and power (Humphreys and Brown, 2002;Clegg, 1993;Mumby, 1987;Smith and Keyton, 2001), the place of ethics has remained relatively unexamined. Given that those who exercise power frequently claim ethical justification for their actions in terms of authoritative rhetoric through narratives (Collier, 1998), not the least in the everyday unfolding of organizational action (Kornberger and Brown, 2007), ethics can be regarded as the domain through which power asserts legitimacy (Byers and Rhodes, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, even though much research has been conducted to show how 'stories can serve as means to provide legitimacy for organizational changes that might otherwise have been considered illegitimate, irrational or unnecessary' (Rhodes and Brown, 2005a, p. 173), less attention has been paid to their implications for organizational ethics (for exceptions see Humphreys and Brown, 2008;Kornberger and Brown, 2007;Rhodes and Brown, 2005b). Whilst there is a well-established literature on organizational storytelling (see Boje, 2001;Czarniawska, 1997Czarniawska, , 2004Gabriel, 2000;Rhodes and Brown, 2005a) and its relation to organizational change (Doolin, 2003;Feldman, 1990;Brown and Humphreys, 2003;Skoldberg, 1994;Stevenson and Greenberg, 1998) and power (Humphreys and Brown, 2002;Clegg, 1993;Mumby, 1987;Smith and Keyton, 2001), the place of ethics has remained relatively unexamined. Given that those who exercise power frequently claim ethical justification for their actions in terms of authoritative rhetoric through narratives (Collier, 1998), not the least in the everyday unfolding of organizational action (Kornberger and Brown, 2007), ethics can be regarded as the domain through which power asserts legitimacy (Byers and Rhodes, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We interpret the ways that members of the organization made sense of the changes, through the stories they told about it (Czarniawska, 2004;Weick, 1995); thus, our methodology is narrative. Specifically, we demonstrate how storytelling in V-tech became dominated by a strongly centred narrative (Boyce, 1995) of inevitable decline that was widely shared across the organization -a narrative charting a 'fall from grace' in which the passage from previous success to current failure was understood fatalistically (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When all material was gathered and organized case by case, the whole mass of text was studied and ordered chronologically to provide an understanding of the implementation processes in the two CAs [21]. The chronological order also facilitated a reading of the material as two separate narratives, incorporating how the implementation processes started and developed, and how the respondents talked about them [23].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the mid-1990s, organisational ethnography as a methodology took root in organisation studies at the same time when cultural anthropology was experiencing what was later called the "narrative turn", which appeared in organisation studies slightly later (Czarniawska 2004). After what seemed to be a moment of separation, both disciplines have, with the narrative turn, been diverging and converging in their practices and conceptions of organisational ethnography.…”
Section: Convergences In the Context Of The Separationmentioning
confidence: 99%