2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narrative language in Williams Syndrome and its neuropsychological correlates

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
37
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the assessment of nonverbal narrative temporal sequencing by use of the picture arrangement subtest is important from a methodological perspective. Other than the study by Marini et al (2010) (with a small mixed sample of children and adults), we are not aware of any other research that has included behavioral indices of temporal sequencing in the context of oral narrating. Furthermore, the current study appears to be the first to control for language skills in relation to the narrative measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, the assessment of nonverbal narrative temporal sequencing by use of the picture arrangement subtest is important from a methodological perspective. Other than the study by Marini et al (2010) (with a small mixed sample of children and adults), we are not aware of any other research that has included behavioral indices of temporal sequencing in the context of oral narrating. Furthermore, the current study appears to be the first to control for language skills in relation to the narrative measure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is true whether matched on receptive vocabulary, 147-149 nonverbal ability, 150 -153 general mental age, 77,90 or when compared with one's own general ability level. 154,155 In addition, youth with WS perform similarly to ID controls 91,113,147 except for those with DS, whom they outperform. 77,90,92,112,156 Furthermore, phonological similarity, word length, frequency, lexicality, concreteness, primacy, and recency have the same effects on immediate verbal memory in young people with WS as in typically developing peers or peers who have ID.…”
Section: Williams Syndromementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Similar disturbances in spatial navigation and narrative discourse processing have been reported also in persons with different aetiologies. Marini, Martelli, Gagliardi, Fabbro, and Borgatti (2010) examined the cognitive, linguistic and narrative profile of children with Williams' Syndrome showing the absence of relevant microlinguistic disturbances but the presence of a massive production of errors of global coherence with reduction of the levels of lexical informativeness. Interestingly, the macrolinguistic difficulties were not correlated to their visualspatial deficits.…”
Section: Unveiling the Relation Between Spatial Navigation And Narratmentioning
confidence: 99%