Philip K. Hitti was the first scholar to study Arab-American immigration to the
United States. Highly influential during the twentieth century, his ideas have
lost much of their appeal to current interpreters of the early diaspora of
Arab-Americans called Syrians at the time. This article revisits Hitti's
thought, focusing on the issues of Palestine and Arab identity. Using primary
source material from Hitti's archived papers, plus multiple secondary sources, I
argue that Hitti maintained consistency, both in his advocacy of the general
Arab stance opposing a Jewish homeland in Palestine, and in his construction of
Arab identity as different from Syrian identity. On Palestine, Hitti clashed
with Albert Einstein, in public discourse and in an acerbic private exchange of
correspondence. On Arab identity, Hitti held firm to a strict interpretation,
distinguishing Syrians, conceptualized as Christian, from Arabs, conceptualized
as Islamic.