1964
DOI: 10.1007/bf00246889
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narcotic antagonists in the benzomorphan series

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
103
0
2

Year Published

1965
1965
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
103
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Exchange of the cyclopropylmethyl moiety of burprenorphine with cyclooctylmethyl lowered affinity at the μ receptor by one order of magnitude but also increased the efficacy substantially, producing essentially a full agonist. This is consistent with results in other fused-ring opiate families, in which substitution of the N-CH 3 with cyclopropylmethyl or allyl substituents leads to antagonist activity while incorporation of a larger moiety, such as phenethyl, restores agonist activity (Harris and Pierson, 1964). As with buprenorphine, introduction of the cyclooctylmethyl into fentanyl (to make SR 14134) and carfentanil (to make SR14143) decreases their μ receptor affinity by one order of magnitude, but in contrast, it converts these compounds into low efficacy partial agonists, on the order of buprenorphine (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Exchange of the cyclopropylmethyl moiety of burprenorphine with cyclooctylmethyl lowered affinity at the μ receptor by one order of magnitude but also increased the efficacy substantially, producing essentially a full agonist. This is consistent with results in other fused-ring opiate families, in which substitution of the N-CH 3 with cyclopropylmethyl or allyl substituents leads to antagonist activity while incorporation of a larger moiety, such as phenethyl, restores agonist activity (Harris and Pierson, 1964). As with buprenorphine, introduction of the cyclooctylmethyl into fentanyl (to make SR 14134) and carfentanil (to make SR14143) decreases their μ receptor affinity by one order of magnitude, but in contrast, it converts these compounds into low efficacy partial agonists, on the order of buprenorphine (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Dermorphin, dissolved in 0.1 ml of 0.9% w/v NaCl solution (saline), or saline alone (controls) was injected into the tail vein in groups of 10 male IRC mice, weighing 25-30 g. The extent of analgesia was expressed as percentage of antinociceptive effect, as described by Harris & Pierson (1964). With a two fold increase in latency of reaction time as a quantal index of inhibition, the median antinociceptive dose (ED50) and 95% confidence limits were calculated according to the method of Litchfield & Wilcoxon (1949).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each test time, the percentage maximum possible effect (%MPE) was calculated as (test latencyÀbaseline latency) Â (cutoff timeÀbaseline latency) À1 Â 100% (Harris & Pierson, 1964). %MPE values at the time point at which the greatest antinociceptive responses were observed for each respective 876…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%