1998
DOI: 10.1002/ana.410430125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narcolepsy in prepubertal children

Abstract: Narcolepsy was diagnosed in 51 children (29 boys). The age range was 2.1 to 11.8 years (mean, 7.9 +/- 3.1 years). A mean of three referrals was made before narcolepsy was considered. In 10 children, cataplexy was the presenting symptom. Thirty-eight children acknowledged sleep paralysis and 30 acknowledged hypnagogic hallucinations. All children had sleep studies; 31 exhibited rapid eye movement at sleep onset. The mean sleep latency was 1.5 minutes +/- 39 seconds on the Multiple Sleep Latency Test. All childr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
91
1
9

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 145 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
91
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…It is also notable that the large majority of the children identified in this study (76%) had onset prior to puberty. This profile contrasts with reports of children from the United States 17,18 and Europe, [19][20][21] where mean age of onset ranges from 9.4-10.3 years old in case series of children, and where the majority of children have onset at or following puberty and rarely prior to 5 years old. [18][19][20][21][22] Referral bias could explain this significantly earlier onset.…”
Section: Group Stratificationcontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is also notable that the large majority of the children identified in this study (76%) had onset prior to puberty. This profile contrasts with reports of children from the United States 17,18 and Europe, [19][20][21] where mean age of onset ranges from 9.4-10.3 years old in case series of children, and where the majority of children have onset at or following puberty and rarely prior to 5 years old. [18][19][20][21][22] Referral bias could explain this significantly earlier onset.…”
Section: Group Stratificationcontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…A minor difference was the observation of decreased SOREMP numbers in presumably prepubertal subjects, a difference that may explain the more frequent report of negative MSLT results in the prepubertal population. 11,17 In this population, however, the percent of those with a positive MSLT (mean sleep latency ≤ 8 min, ≥ 2 SOREMPs) overall did not differ across puberty group, thus the MSLT was found to be an adequate diagnostic test in children (Tables 3 and 4). There are case reports on precocious puberty and narcolepsy-cataplexy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…We might expect an increase as more practitioners become aware of narcolepsy or have the experience of diagnosing someone in their practice. There is the possibility that the condition is, as suggested by others, relatively rare in children when compared to adults; 8 however, that assumption may prove to be untenable. Delayed or mistaken referral diagnoses were common, as the identification of abnormal sleep-wake behavior in children by a non-specialist is believed to be difficult.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, several more comprehensive publications 11,12,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] have extended the usual adult descriptions and indicated ways in which the sometimes special features of childhood narcolepsy can cause particular difficulties in its recognition.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%