2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.2008.00503.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narcissistic Subtypes and Contingent Self‐Esteem: Do All Narcissists Base Their Self‐Esteem on the Same Domains?

Abstract: It has been suggested that there are two forms of narcissism: a grandiose subtype and a vulnerable subtype. Although these forms of narcissism share certain similarities, it is believed that these subtypes may differ in the domains upon which their self-esteem is based. To explore this possibility, the present study examined the associations between these narcissistic subtypes and domain-specific contingencies of self-worth. The results show that vulnerable narcissism was positively associated with contingenci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

5
104
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 179 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
5
104
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As outlined in recent studies (Tritt, Ryder, Ring, & Pincus, 2010;Wright, Lukowitsky, Pincus, & Conroy, in press), these seven dimensions load onto the two higher-order factors of grandiose narcissism (exploitative, selfsacrificing self-enhancement, and grandiose fantasy) and vulnerable narcissism (contingent self-esteem, hiding the self, entitlement rage, and devaluing). Initial information concerning the reliability and validity of the PNI has shown that it is correlated in the expected direction with other measures of narcissism (e.g., NPI) as well as related constructs such as self-esteem level, interpersonal style, clinical outcomes, and contingent self-esteem (Pincus et al, 2009;Zeigler-Hill, Clark, & Pickard, 2008). The internal consistencies of the PNI grandiosity and vulnerability subscales were .86 and .95, respectively.…”
Section: Pathological Narcissismmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…As outlined in recent studies (Tritt, Ryder, Ring, & Pincus, 2010;Wright, Lukowitsky, Pincus, & Conroy, in press), these seven dimensions load onto the two higher-order factors of grandiose narcissism (exploitative, selfsacrificing self-enhancement, and grandiose fantasy) and vulnerable narcissism (contingent self-esteem, hiding the self, entitlement rage, and devaluing). Initial information concerning the reliability and validity of the PNI has shown that it is correlated in the expected direction with other measures of narcissism (e.g., NPI) as well as related constructs such as self-esteem level, interpersonal style, clinical outcomes, and contingent self-esteem (Pincus et al, 2009;Zeigler-Hill, Clark, & Pickard, 2008). The internal consistencies of the PNI grandiosity and vulnerability subscales were .86 and .95, respectively.…”
Section: Pathological Narcissismmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…& Hogan, 1991b; Sedikides, Cisek, & Hart, 2011;Sedikides & Gregg, 2001, 2008Wink, 1991;Zeigler-Hill, Clark, & Pickard, 2008). For example, Raskin et al (1991b) descdbed narcissism as a strategy for managing self-esteem via grandiosity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Narsisizm, büyüklük, kibirlilik, benlik sevgisi, diğer kişilere yönelik düşük endişe, empati yoksunluğu ve kişilerarası ilişkilerde takdir, onay bekleme ile karakterizedir (Campbell, Goodie ve Foster, 2004;Hirschi ve Jaensch, 2014;Pincus ve Roche, 2007;Sokolova, 2010;Zeigler-Hill, Clark ve Pickard, 2008). Narsisizm özelliklerine sahip kişiler, tek ve eşsiz olduklarını, diğer kişilerden daha iyi olduklarını düşünebilmekte, sosyal kurallara uymayı reddedebilmekte ve başka insanların acı çekmesinden zevk alabilmektedirler (Campbell, Goodie ve Foster, 2004;Sokolova, 2010).…”
unclassified