2021
DOI: 10.1037/per0000437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narcissistic and dependent behaviors in the Battle of the Sexes game.

Abstract: We used the 2-person, 2-choice Battle of the Sexes game to model dominant and submissive behaviors in individuals with narcissistic and dependent traits in an online sample. In the Battle of the Sexes, participants share an interest in coordinating an outcome (either A or B). However, one player prefers they coordinate on Outcome A, whereas the other prefers they both coordinate on Outcome B. When provoked by a preemptive commitment (Experiment 1), we found that narcissistic traits were positively associated w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
(39 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are, however, only partially consistent with previous research examining trait narcissism and dependency in the Battle of the Sexes (BoS) game. This research found that trait narcissism predicted participant defection in the BoS game only when participants were provoked with a preemptive threat from their partner ( 64 ). These results might be reconciled when considering participants’ partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…They are, however, only partially consistent with previous research examining trait narcissism and dependency in the Battle of the Sexes (BoS) game. This research found that trait narcissism predicted participant defection in the BoS game only when participants were provoked with a preemptive threat from their partner ( 64 ). These results might be reconciled when considering participants’ partners.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…These results might be reconciled when considering participants’ partners. Here, participants were told they were playing with another Prolific participant while Simon and Reed ( 64 ) told participants to imagine they were playing with someone who was very close to them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations