2009
DOI: 10.1177/1753193409348185
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Narakas classification of obstetric brachial plexus palsy revisited

Abstract: Narakas classified babies with obstetric palsy into four groups: upper Erb's, extended Erb's, total palsy, and total palsy with a Horner. Over the last 15 years, it was noted at our obstetric palsy clinic that good spontaneous recovery in newborns with extended Erb's palsy (C5, C6, C7 injury) was more likely if they recovered active wrist extension against gravity before 2 months of age. A hypothesis was made that newborns with extended Erb's palsy (Narakas Group II) may be subclassified into two groups accord… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
44
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 80 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
44
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Information regarding the severity of the neurological injury at the time of the initial evaluation was reviewed, and the Narakas classification was used to divide the patients into a C5-6 injury group (group I), a C5-7 injury group (group II), and a global C5-T1 injury group (group III) (see Appendix) 22,23 . Of the 319 patients included in the study, 154 were in group I, ninety-nine were in group II, and sixty-six were in group III.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information regarding the severity of the neurological injury at the time of the initial evaluation was reviewed, and the Narakas classification was used to divide the patients into a C5-6 injury group (group I), a C5-7 injury group (group II), and a global C5-T1 injury group (group III) (see Appendix) 22,23 . Of the 319 patients included in the study, 154 were in group I, ninety-nine were in group II, and sixty-six were in group III.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among families that had pursued malpractice litigation, the majority believed that 1) their child had sustained an unnecessary birth injury (p = 0.002); 2) they had not received adequate information in the perinatal period (p = 0.003); 3) their concerns had been ignored in the perinatal period (p = 0.005); and 4) these concerns had not been adequately addressed by their treating practitioners (p < 0.001). The most common reasons identified by families for pursuing legal action included 1) There was also a significant difference between groups as to recommendations to seek legal action. Sixty-six percent of families (33) received a suggestion to pursue a medical malpractice claim.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…1 Groups I and II are considered to be less extensive, and Groups III and IV are considered more extensive. This manner of analysis was justified clinically because the higher-grade lesions require more intensive treatments, including surgical repair and intensive occupational therapy that can impose a financial burden to the family.…”
Section: Physical Extent Of Nerve Root Involvement In Nbpp and Malpramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of Erb's palsy was more in patients with traffic accidents and birth injury. 16 According to measurement of Sunderland, C5 and C6 have the short length of ramus. It makes nerves become more susceptible to damage when the traction occurred.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%