2015
DOI: 10.1179/1432891715z.0000000001316
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

(NaPO3)6-assisted wet formation of dispersive Mg(OH)2 nanoplates

Abstract: Dispersive Mg(OH) 2 hexagonal nanoplates with a diameter of 100-400 nm and a thickness of 20-40 nm were synthesised by treating the flower-like Mg(OH) 2 micro-agglomerates in sodium hexametaphosphate ((NaPO 3 ) 6 ) aqueous solution at 80°C for 12 hours. Compared with the blank experiment, the presence of 0.05 mol L −1 sodium hexametaphosphate accelerated the dissolution and recrystallisation of Mg(OH) 2 owing to the complex interaction between sodium hexametaphosphate and Mg 2+ , leading to the increase of [Mg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The change of zeta potential of Mg(OH) 2 from positive (without SH or SS) to negative (with SH or SS) indicates the adsorption of negatively charged SH or SS on Mg(OH) 2 surface. 37,38 3.4 FTIR analysis FTIR spectral analyses (Fig. 5) were carried out to further understand the interaction between dispersants and colloidal Mg(OH) 2 or MoS 2 particles.…”
Section: Edlvo Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The change of zeta potential of Mg(OH) 2 from positive (without SH or SS) to negative (with SH or SS) indicates the adsorption of negatively charged SH or SS on Mg(OH) 2 surface. 37,38 3.4 FTIR analysis FTIR spectral analyses (Fig. 5) were carried out to further understand the interaction between dispersants and colloidal Mg(OH) 2 or MoS 2 particles.…”
Section: Edlvo Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meanwhile, the zeta potentials were also detected. The zeta potential of the modified MH in the nanodispersion decreases from 5.42 to −30.3 mV compared to the unmodified MH, which is attributed to the adsorption of the SHMP . The increased negative charges on the MH surface can inhibit the aggregates or agglomerations by the electrostatic repulsion.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The zeta potential of the modified MH in the nanodispersion decreases from 5.42 to −30.3 mV compared to the unmodified MH, which is attributed to the adsorption of the SHMP. 34 The increased negative charges on the MH surface can inhibit the aggregates or agglomerations by the electrostatic repulsion. Figure 2d shows the photographs of the MH aqueous nanodispersion and unmodified MH suspension in water with the MH solid content of 1 wt %.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%