2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2012.12.049
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanowear behaviour of monocrystalline silicon against SiO2 tip in water

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results suggested that the chemistry of the SiO 2 surfaces contributes to the wear of the material at loads lower than the hardness value causing mechanical deformation of the material. The proposed mechanism for wear of the native oxide layer, the creation of siloxane bridges (chemical bonds) [120], could pertain to the glass wear behavior [121,122]. A surface force apparatus study found that the adhesion force of two silica surfaces in humid conditions was greater than the capillary force expected from water [123].…”
Section: Environmental Effect On Friction and Wear Of Oxides And Glassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results suggested that the chemistry of the SiO 2 surfaces contributes to the wear of the material at loads lower than the hardness value causing mechanical deformation of the material. The proposed mechanism for wear of the native oxide layer, the creation of siloxane bridges (chemical bonds) [120], could pertain to the glass wear behavior [121,122]. A surface force apparatus study found that the adhesion force of two silica surfaces in humid conditions was greater than the capillary force expected from water [123].…”
Section: Environmental Effect On Friction and Wear Of Oxides And Glassesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was believed that the silica surface was chemically reactive enough to form Si-O-Si bridging bonds between two sliding solid surfaces, while the diamond surface was chemically inert (or not reactive enough) to induce the tribochemical wear of silica surface. It was also observed that the nanowear of silicon surfaces could be prevented when rubbing with the SiO 2 tip in ethanol vapor, and the hillock formation by the diamond tip was reduced by 80% in ethanol vapor, compared to the one formed in humid air [15]. These reports suggest that the chemical reactivity of counter-surfaces play important roles in the mechanochemical wear of sliding interfaces.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…For example, the nanowear results of silicon surfaces could vary significantly when rubbing against different countersurfaces [14][15][16]. A deep wear of silicon in humid environments occurred only when the counter-surface was SiO 2 , while a hillock formation on the silicon substrate was observed when the counter-surface was diamond [14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All nanowear tests were performed by an AFM system equipped with an environmental control system and a relative humidity (RH) detector (HP22-A, Rotronic, Switzerland), as shown in Figure 1(a). More details of these systems could be found in a previous publication [19]. Two kinds of AFM tips were used: Previous investigations reported that the hillock-like protrusion could be formed at silicon and quartz surfaces under nanoscale friction and wear testing [20].…”
Section: Experiments Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%