2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.taap.2011.11.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanotoxicology and in vitro studies: The need of the hour

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
301
0
9

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 471 publications
(316 citation statements)
references
References 173 publications
2
301
0
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Nel et al have first raised this thought in 2006, emphasizing on the necessity to optimize the classical in vitro toxicity assays as they show several shortcomings when they are being applied for NP toxicity evaluation 28 . We believe that the major issues with the current in vitro methods are (i) the lack of a complete characterization of the particles, (ii ) the lack of standardisation and guidelines on how to perform a toxicological evaluation in vitro, (iii) the possibility of NP interfering with the assay and therefore lack of appropriate methods to evaluate nanotoxicity and (iv) the shortcomings inherent to the most used classical 2D monocultures 11,82,93,104,105 . It is therefore clear that further research on the optimization of methods is highly recommended in order to obtain reproducible data that would allow drawing firm conclusions regarding NP toxicity.…”
Section: Issues With Routine Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Nel et al have first raised this thought in 2006, emphasizing on the necessity to optimize the classical in vitro toxicity assays as they show several shortcomings when they are being applied for NP toxicity evaluation 28 . We believe that the major issues with the current in vitro methods are (i) the lack of a complete characterization of the particles, (ii ) the lack of standardisation and guidelines on how to perform a toxicological evaluation in vitro, (iii) the possibility of NP interfering with the assay and therefore lack of appropriate methods to evaluate nanotoxicity and (iv) the shortcomings inherent to the most used classical 2D monocultures 11,82,93,104,105 . It is therefore clear that further research on the optimization of methods is highly recommended in order to obtain reproducible data that would allow drawing firm conclusions regarding NP toxicity.…”
Section: Issues With Routine Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This issue is very complex since total exposure includes intentional and unintentional exposure for consumers as well as for workers at the production site via different exposure routes with the respiratory system, the GI tract and the skin being the main portals of entry 11,74,115 . Additionally exposure may occur during every stage of the NP's lifecycle, being the development, manufacturing, use and disposal of the NP 123 .…”
Section: Issues With Routine In Vivo Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The heterogeneity of NMs severely limits the feasibility of producing general toxicity protocols to address NM risk assessment. However, reliable, robust and validated protocols for testing NP/NM toxicity (Table 1) are essential for human and environmental risk assessment 5, 8, 9…”
Section: Introduction To High‐throughput Screening Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, obtaining toxicological data from in vitro assays alone has potential limitations since the behavior of cells with NMs in culture differs from their behavior in the complex biological systems of the whole organism 9. This is attributed to what is known as ‘coordinated tissue response,’ perhaps the most under‐researched area in the field of toxicology 5. Ideally, when considering screening novel NMs for toxic effects we should use a combination of in vitro methods simulating as closely as possible in vivo conditions.…”
Section: Introduction To High‐throughput Screening Of Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%