2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.cattod.2005.06.034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanostructured metal films: Fabrication and catalytic properties

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1B, that the size of the Ni particles is 1.5 ± 0.5 nm. Narrow particle size distribution is in accordance with the data previously obtained for Ni on Si supports in [6], however, in our case the mean particle size is smaller than in the cited paper (1.5 vs. 2.3 nm). Also, short chains formed by Ni particles are clearly seen in Fig.…”
Section: Hrtem Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…1B, that the size of the Ni particles is 1.5 ± 0.5 nm. Narrow particle size distribution is in accordance with the data previously obtained for Ni on Si supports in [6], however, in our case the mean particle size is smaller than in the cited paper (1.5 vs. 2.3 nm). Also, short chains formed by Ni particles are clearly seen in Fig.…”
Section: Hrtem Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…As it was demonstrated previously for Pd, Ni, and Cu deposited on C, Si, and SiO 2 /Si [3,6], the size of the metal nanoparticles deposited on the support by the LED method depends on the metal nature only: the mean particle size of Pd is about 2.1 nm, Ni forms particles about 2.3 nm in size, for Cu this value is equal to 5 nm. However, so far no Au nanostructures obtained by LED have been reported.…”
Section: Hrtem Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another interpretation may be proposed by a direct interparticle interaction as recently proposed by Rostovshchikova et al [69]. Indeed even if the calculation of the inter-particle distance, from BET surface area value, seems to give rather high values (ranging from 4 to 10 nm), one should consider the real topology of the porous support, including three-dimensional topology which may lead to real inter-particle distances much lower that theoretical ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%