2012
DOI: 10.1186/1476-511x-11-159
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanostructured Lipid Carriers: A potential drug carrier for cancer chemotherapy

Abstract: Nanotechnology having developed exponentially, the aim has been on therapeutic undertaking, particularly for cancerous disease chemotherapy. Nanostructured lipid carriers have attracted expanding scientific and commercial vigilance in the last couple of years as alternate carriers for the pharmaceutical consignment, particularly anticancer pharmaceuticals. Shortcomings often came across with anticancer mixtures, such as poor solubility, normal tissue toxicity, poor specificity and steadiness, as well as the hi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
80
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
80
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…2 However, these investigated delivery systems show their own drawbacks. Frequently reported disadvantages of colloidal carriers such as liposomes, micro and nanoemulsions, nanocapsules, nanosponges, and polymeric nanoparticles include burst drug release in orallyadministered drugs due to its rapid degradation by the pH of the stomach or by intestinal enzymes and bile salts, limited physical and chemical stability during storage, [3][4][5][6][7][8] difficulty in large-scale production, residues from organic solvents used in preparation of the carriers, some susceptibilities in polymer toxicity, [8][9][10] and too many more to mention. All of these drawbacks suggest that these colloidal drug delivery systems are not ideal for use as drug carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2 However, these investigated delivery systems show their own drawbacks. Frequently reported disadvantages of colloidal carriers such as liposomes, micro and nanoemulsions, nanocapsules, nanosponges, and polymeric nanoparticles include burst drug release in orallyadministered drugs due to its rapid degradation by the pH of the stomach or by intestinal enzymes and bile salts, limited physical and chemical stability during storage, [3][4][5][6][7][8] difficulty in large-scale production, residues from organic solvents used in preparation of the carriers, some susceptibilities in polymer toxicity, [8][9][10] and too many more to mention. All of these drawbacks suggest that these colloidal drug delivery systems are not ideal for use as drug carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these drawbacks suggest that these colloidal drug delivery systems are not ideal for use as drug carriers. 8 Nanolipid carriers have gained much interest in pharmaceutical sciences for several delivery routes, e.g., dermal, 11,12 oral, 13 parenteral, 14 pulmonary, [15][16][17][18] and ocular. 19,20 Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) were introduced in the early 1990s as drug carriers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But, the common disadvantages experienced with solid lipid nanoparticles are particles growing, unpredictable gelation tendency, unexpected dynamics of polymorphic transitions and inherent low incorporation rate due to the crystalline structure of the solid lipid (Das and Chaudhury 2011;Muller et al 2002a, b;Selvamuthukumar and Velmurugan 2012). In general, drug molecules stay in between the fatty acid chains or as amorphous clusters in crystal imperfections within SLN matrix.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these explored nanoparticulate delivery systems demonstrate their own disadvantages. Commonly reported drawbacks of colloidal carriers such as liposomes, nanosponges, microemulsions and nanoemulsions, polymeric nanoparticles, and nanocapsules are burst drug release, physical and chemical instability during storage, [20][21][22][23] difficulty in industrial fabrication, the presence of organic solvents applied in the production of these systems, some limitations in polymer toxicity 24,25 and many more too numerous to mention. All of these disadvantages suggest that these colloidal drug delivery systems are not perfect.…”
Section: -Azacytidine Was First Synthesized In 1963mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these disadvantages suggest that these colloidal drug delivery systems are not perfect. 24 Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) were developed in the beginning of the 1990s as drug carriers 26 proposing the superiorities of emulsions, liposomes, and polymeric nanoparticles. The solid lipid matrix is able to protect encapsulated drugs from chemical instability and offer sustaining drug release patterns compared with nanoemulsions.…”
Section: -Azacytidine Was First Synthesized In 1963mentioning
confidence: 99%