2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultramic.2015.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanostructure characterisation of flow-formed Cr–Mo–V steel using transmission Kikuchi diffraction technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All TKD and EBSD scans were performed using a Jeol JSM-7800F Field Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscope (FEG-SEM) with Nordlys Nano hardware and AZtec 2.1 software package that acquire TKD, EBSD and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) data. The same TKD procedure, detailed in Birosca et al, 2015, was used here. TEM foil was mounted using a microclamp SEM sub-stage which was fixed to a standard 70º tilted EBSD sample holder.…”
Section: Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction (Tkd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All TKD and EBSD scans were performed using a Jeol JSM-7800F Field Emission Gun Scanning Electron Microscope (FEG-SEM) with Nordlys Nano hardware and AZtec 2.1 software package that acquire TKD, EBSD and Energy Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy (EDS) data. The same TKD procedure, detailed in Birosca et al, 2015, was used here. TEM foil was mounted using a microclamp SEM sub-stage which was fixed to a standard 70º tilted EBSD sample holder.…”
Section: Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction (Tkd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the DP quality and indexing rate reduced to less than 50% beyond 7.2 microns and 0% after 8.6 microns away from TEM foil perforation edge, see the distorted and diffused diffraction pattern at 8.6 micron in the same figure. Birosca et al, 2015, reported that the sharpest DPs can be obtained where the TEM foil thickness was ~100 nm. It seems that the thickness of TEM foil at 8.6 microns was much thicker than 100 nm in the current study.…”
Section: Transmission Kikuchi Diffraction (Tkd) Characterisationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tempered lath martensite and deformed microstructures were obtained after the heat treatment. In the case of tempering, the austenite phase transformation does not occur, so some deformed microstructure remains [21]. On the other hand, the deformed microstructure transforms into an austenitic structure by heating at the phase transformation temperature (Ac 3 , the temperature at which the α-to-γ transformation commences) or higher temperatures under the normalized condition [22].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figures 3 and 4 Morpholoiges after the different heat treatment conditions are classified into tempered lath martensite structure and deformed structure. Since the morphologies of tempering heat treatment conditions that the austenite phase transformation did not occur, the deformed structure was remained [20]. On the other hand, the deformed microstructure was transformed into an austenitic structure by heating at the Ar3 (the temperature at which the α to γ transformation commences on heating) transformation point or higher in the normalized condition [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%