2001
DOI: 10.1039/b100553g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanosized tin dioxide: Spectroscopic (UV–VIS, NIR, EPR) and electrical conductivity studies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
29
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The DRIFT spectra taken of the pure SnO 2 sample were in line with this mechanism ( Figure 10 a). There were decreasing bands visible at 1060 cm −1 [ 48 ], 1120 cm −1 [ 48 ], and 1270 cm −1 [ 47 ], which were attributed to the lattice oxygen of SnO 2 . The increasing bands at 1302 cm −1 , 1348 cm −1 , 1442 cm −1 , and 1561 cm −1 were attributed to surface carbonates [ 49 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DRIFT spectra taken of the pure SnO 2 sample were in line with this mechanism ( Figure 10 a). There were decreasing bands visible at 1060 cm −1 [ 48 ], 1120 cm −1 [ 48 ], and 1270 cm −1 [ 47 ], which were attributed to the lattice oxygen of SnO 2 . The increasing bands at 1302 cm −1 , 1348 cm −1 , 1442 cm −1 , and 1561 cm −1 were attributed to surface carbonates [ 49 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NIR analysis (Figure 1d) contributes to elucidating the mechanism involved during the oxidation process, being directly related to the water molecules adsorbed on the surface of the SnO 2 samples. As seen in Figure 1d there are three characteristic peaks of water, i. e., ∼7,000 cm −1 corresponds to surface hydroxyl groups (1 st overtone), ∼5,000 cm −1 attributed to crystalline water (hydroxide, 1 st overtone) and 4,500 cm −1 attributed to xerogel structure [19] . Normalizing all the peaks by the surface hydroxyl groups, one can see differences in the distribution of crystalline water, which tends to increase (in proportion) according to the annealing temperature.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 96%
“…As has been shown previously, a decrease in reflectance in the visible range of SnO 2 is caused by increased sample absorption originating from the presence of oxygen vacancies, i.e., SnO 2 reduction . [13] In fact, Figure 1 shows that starting from the oxidized gas sensor (air), exposure to increasingly reducing gas environments (air!N 2 !EtOH/air!EtOH/N 2 ) results in a systematic decrease in the reflectance as a result of increasing absorption in the visible, as indicated for example by the behavior at 525 nm (see dashed line). Note that the legend displays the order of the experiments from top to bottom.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%