2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2022.121213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NanoSIMS as an analytical tool for measuring oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in clay minerals from palaeosols: Analytical procedure and preliminary results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(98 reference statements)
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Certied U particles were used 26 in a comparison of AMS, SIMS and TIMS for the determination of isotope ratios in individual U particles, an application important for nuclear provenance and safeguarding purposes. The relative errors in the determination of 234 U/ 235 U and 234 U/ 236 U in NBL CRM U200 (uranium isotopic standard) by AMS were <10 and <20%, respectively, whereas the results obtained by ssion track-TIMS and SIMS were within ±5% and ±10% of the certied values, respectively, for both techniques. The relative error and external precision of 234 U/ 238 U and 235 U/ 238 U in the analysis of NBL CRM U850 (uranium (U 3 O 8 ) isotopic standard, 85% U-235) by AMS, SEM-TIMS or SIMS were <10% and <5%, respectively.…”
Section: Reference Materials and Instrumental Intercomparisonsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Certied U particles were used 26 in a comparison of AMS, SIMS and TIMS for the determination of isotope ratios in individual U particles, an application important for nuclear provenance and safeguarding purposes. The relative errors in the determination of 234 U/ 235 U and 234 U/ 236 U in NBL CRM U200 (uranium isotopic standard) by AMS were <10 and <20%, respectively, whereas the results obtained by ssion track-TIMS and SIMS were within ±5% and ±10% of the certied values, respectively, for both techniques. The relative error and external precision of 234 U/ 238 U and 235 U/ 238 U in the analysis of NBL CRM U850 (uranium (U 3 O 8 ) isotopic standard, 85% U-235) by AMS, SEM-TIMS or SIMS were <10% and <5%, respectively.…”
Section: Reference Materials and Instrumental Intercomparisonsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The relative error and external precision of 234 U/ 238 U and 235 U/ 238 U in the analysis of NBL CRM U850 (uranium (U 3 O 8 ) isotopic standard, 85% U-235) by AMS, SEM-TIMS or SIMS were <10% and <5%, respectively. The average values of the relative error and external precision for 236 U/ 238 U were both <5% for AMS analysis but <10% for SEM-TIMS or SIMS analyses. The EDXRFS and SF-ICP-MS analyses in an inter-laboratory comparison of PM 2.5 lters from the IMPROVE air monitoring network gave 27 results that agreed within ±20%.…”
Section: Reference Materials and Instrumental Intercomparisonsmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations