2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2009.07.072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanosecond electric pulses trigger actin responses in plant cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
36
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
36
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast to directly induced permeabilization, this process develops within minutes after pulse exposure. 5 In summary, the results confirm the theoretically predicted distribution of the membrane voltage for spherical cells with negligible permeabilization. The observed deviations were caused by enhanced pore formation, while the asymmetric charging process at both cell hemispheres can be explained by the high negative resting potential of plant cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…In contrast to directly induced permeabilization, this process develops within minutes after pulse exposure. 5 In summary, the results confirm the theoretically predicted distribution of the membrane voltage for spherical cells with negligible permeabilization. The observed deviations were caused by enhanced pore formation, while the asymmetric charging process at both cell hemispheres can be explained by the high negative resting potential of plant cells.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 78%
“…Therefore, acute remodelling of actin near the site of sonoporation can by and large be regarded as a cytoprotective process that would facilitate pore closure [20,21]. In fact, a similar actin disruption phenomenon has been reported in cells punctured by a micro-tip [36] or pulsed by short-duration electrical fields [37,38].…”
Section: Accumulation Of Globular Actin In Sonoporated Cellsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In such a structure, the mechanical disturbance of any individual element allows stress signals to propagate and be transduced at relatively distant locations (Ingber, 2008). Thus, the mechanically stable cell walls provide structural support, and the constant remodeling of the underlying cytoskeleton in response to mechanical disturbances acts as a tensegrity sensor (Komis et al, 2002;Berghöfer et al, 2009;Nick, 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%