2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2021.11.865
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale organization of ryanodine receptor distribution and phosphorylation pattern determines the dynamics of calcium sparks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This model also included differentiation between non-phosphorylated and phosphorylated RyRs (modeled as a simple increase in sensitivity to Ca 2+ ), and results support the conclusions of both Cannell et al (2013) and Walker et al (2014) regarding the importance of both number and specific arrangement of RyRs for triggered Ca 2+ spark dynamics and fidelity. Mesa et al (2021) also investigated the functional impact of selected phosphorylated RyRs within a cluster, indicating that they can play a compensatory role in recovering healthy spark dynamics which had been lost through cluster disruption. Iaparov et al (2021) developed a 2D model which included further possibilities for RyR arrangement and spacing (including both approaches outlined above), number, and dyad extent.…”
Section: Spatial Models Of the Single Dyad/nanodomainmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This model also included differentiation between non-phosphorylated and phosphorylated RyRs (modeled as a simple increase in sensitivity to Ca 2+ ), and results support the conclusions of both Cannell et al (2013) and Walker et al (2014) regarding the importance of both number and specific arrangement of RyRs for triggered Ca 2+ spark dynamics and fidelity. Mesa et al (2021) also investigated the functional impact of selected phosphorylated RyRs within a cluster, indicating that they can play a compensatory role in recovering healthy spark dynamics which had been lost through cluster disruption. Iaparov et al (2021) developed a 2D model which included further possibilities for RyR arrangement and spacing (including both approaches outlined above), number, and dyad extent.…”
Section: Spatial Models Of the Single Dyad/nanodomainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most straight-forward method is to implement the Monte-Carlo approach: the state of each individual channel is tracked directly, and state-transitions are determined based on random numbers and the probability of transition The release flux is then given by the sum of the open channels in each dyad. This approach is ideally suited to cases where each individual channel is required to be tracked, for example in spatial models of the single nanodomain (Mesa et al, 2021). However, in larger models, e.g., of the wholecell, this then requires the state of ∼50 RyRs + ∼15 LTCCs per dyad × ∼20,000 dyads to be tracked individually, with random numbers generated to determine state transitions for each one, which can be computationally intensive.…”
Section: Numerical Solutions To the Ryanodine Receptors Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%