2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.gsf.2022.101405
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale mechanical property variations concerning mineral composition and contact of marine shale

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
42
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to conventional reservoir pore research methods, theoretical methods of porous material characterization are also introduced to pore characteristics of shale, which can be roughly summarized as image analysis, fluid injection method, and nonfluid injection method [25][26][27][28][29]. Image analysis techniques such as scanning electron microscopy [25,30], field emission scanning electron microscopy [31,32], focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy [33], transmission electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy can be used to intuitively observe and analyse the morphology and size of microscopic pores in shale [30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Geofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to conventional reservoir pore research methods, theoretical methods of porous material characterization are also introduced to pore characteristics of shale, which can be roughly summarized as image analysis, fluid injection method, and nonfluid injection method [25][26][27][28][29]. Image analysis techniques such as scanning electron microscopy [25,30], field emission scanning electron microscopy [31,32], focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy [33], transmission electron microscopy, and atomic force microscopy can be used to intuitively observe and analyse the morphology and size of microscopic pores in shale [30][31][32][33][34][35].…”
Section: Geofluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is favored by countries worldwide for its clean and efficient characteristics, wide distribution, and large reserves, which are considered major strategic resource reserves [5][6][7]. Nevertheless, the small pores (nanoscale pores) and low permeability of shale gas reservoirs have led to low shale gas recovery and extraction efficiency [8][9][10][11]. Additionally, due to the apparent tectonic stress activity in multiple phases, the spatial distribution of mineral components is anisotropic and inhomogeneous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the largest superimposed basin in China, Ordos Basin has long been considered a multi-energy basin with abundant fossil energy and mineral resources. A set of upper Paleozoic coalbearing shales in the southeast Ordos Basin is widely considered a potential area for shale gas exploration and development (Li et al, 2022b;Zhang et al, 2022). The coal-bearing shale gas resources of the Shanxi-Taiyuan Formation are in the range of 2800-3200*10 8 m 3 in the Daning-Jixian block, southeastern Ordos Basin (Zeng et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%