2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale friction of graphene oxide over glass-fibre and polystyrene

Abstract: Coatings of graphene oxide over two substrates of glass-fibre and polystyrene were obtained by electrophoretic deposition (EPD). A chemical reduction of graphene oxide by exposure to hydrazine hydrate at 100°C significantly changes the interfacial interaction with the substrate as well as the tribology. Spectroscopic techniques like Fourier transform infrared, Raman spectroscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction showed that the treatment with hydrazine replaces oxygen functional groups an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The same conclusions cannot be drawn considering the intensity of the TE process, since the difference of the rGO amount deposited passing from NEF to 2T is too small to be detected by SEM analysis. Further quantitative investigations, for example by using friction force microscopy (FFM) [27,44], could give more information on the effective quantity of the nanomaterial deposited upon the electrification. It can be, however, deduced that a physical interaction between GO nanosheets with charged GF takes place due to the creation of attractive surface charges on the latter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same conclusions cannot be drawn considering the intensity of the TE process, since the difference of the rGO amount deposited passing from NEF to 2T is too small to be detected by SEM analysis. Further quantitative investigations, for example by using friction force microscopy (FFM) [27,44], could give more information on the effective quantity of the nanomaterial deposited upon the electrification. It can be, however, deduced that a physical interaction between GO nanosheets with charged GF takes place due to the creation of attractive surface charges on the latter.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, both SiC nanoparticles and GO flakes were intercalated into the pores of giant reed, which were opened through chemical treatment and then closed by thermo-compression (Figure 1, Figure 2a). It can be interpreted in terms of better interfacial adhesion or increased in the chemical cross-linking at the interface driven by the additional hydrogen bonds available from the GO structure [48,49] and the nonstoichiometric oxides shell (Figure 2i) on SiC nanostructures [50,51]. Not to mention that the small amount of Ca impurities, which was found in all the samples (see Figure S1), was reported to have a beneficial effect on the chemical cross-linking between GO and cellulose [52], thus effectively enhancing the stiffness and the strength between GO layers [53].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We observed an increment of Young’s modulus and tensile strength for the hybrid fillers in the composite as compared to neat PS and PS-GO laminate. Under tensile loading, the higher shear strength between PS-GO/C-SWNT, interlayer bridging of GO sheets through C-SWNT are responsible for enhanced energy dissipation loading and resulted in higher toughness modulus [ 68 , 69 , 70 ] than the GO-PS system. Nevertheless, the toughness modulus of the PS is the highest among the PS-GO and PS- GO/C-SWNT due to the lower capability of the carbon materials (graphene and carbon nanotubes) to absorb energy and accommodate large deformation [ 71 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%