2021
DOI: 10.1002/admi.202001662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoscale Analysis of Surface Bending Strain in Film Substrates for Preventing Fracture in Flexible Electronic Devices

Abstract: be circumvented by exploiting an elementary mechanics that surface bending strain decreases linearly with a thickness of a substrate. For example, flexible substrates with a thicknesses of 10 µm experience peak surface strain of only 0.1% upon bending to the radius of curvature of 5 mm, and this strain remains well below the fracture limits of semiconductors (≈1%), metals (1-2%), and hard coatings (1-3%); indeed, the use of a substrate within a range below tens of micrometers enables comparable growth, resulti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of ε can be calculated using the formula ε = (d × κ)/2, where d is the thickness of the PET substrate and κ is the applied curvature. 36 In the present study, d is 0.125 mm. As shown in Figure 3d, the curve of the resistance variation in the perpendicular bending versus curvature can be divided into two linear parts, region I (0 < κ < 0.05 mm −1 ) and region II (0.05 < κ < 0.20 mm −1 ) with coefficients of determination of 0.994 and 0.995, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of ε can be calculated using the formula ε = (d × κ)/2, where d is the thickness of the PET substrate and κ is the applied curvature. 36 In the present study, d is 0.125 mm. As shown in Figure 3d, the curve of the resistance variation in the perpendicular bending versus curvature can be divided into two linear parts, region I (0 < κ < 0.05 mm −1 ) and region II (0.05 < κ < 0.20 mm −1 ) with coefficients of determination of 0.994 and 0.995, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…We analyzed the result of Figure d by evaluating the sensor sensitivity using GF, which is defined as GF = (Δ R / R 0 )/ε, where ε is the surface bending strain. The value of ε can be calculated using the formula ε = ( d × κ)/2, where d is the thickness of the PET substrate and κ is the applied curvature . In the present study, d is 0.125 mm.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flexible electronics with high adaptability and easy deployment has been widely applied. The flexible electronics usually consists of a flexible substrate, the circuits assembled on a flexible substrate, and the electronic components or modules. The flexible substrate could be films such as polyimide (PI), poly­(ethylene terephthalate) (PET), and poly­(ethylene naphthalate) (PEN). The circuits could be various metals such as gold (Au), silver (Ag), and copper (Cu) . The electronic components or modules could be silicon-based or organic thin film-based small electronic components or the miniature electronic modules made by conventional print circuit boards (PCBs) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[22][23][24] Other methods using light diffraction or digital image correlation, etc., have been limited to the strain analyses on surfaces or cross-section, in principle. [25][26][27][28][29][30] Therefore, a flexible strain sensor, which can be used to facilely measure the internal strain in bending materials, could play a key role in identifying the NMP position.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%