2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.05.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoporous Mo 2 C functionalized 3D carbon architecture anode for boosting flavins mediated interfacial bioelectrocatalysis in microbial fuel cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In most cases, hierarchical structures used to form microbial anodes are based on the association of a macro-porous structure, which corresponds to the types of structure dealt with in this review, and a nano-structure, which can be obtained in various ways, including by using carbon nanotubes (Zhao et al, 2011;Flexer et al 2013) or nano-porous graphene (Qiao et al, 2014). These nano-structures can promote bacterial attachment and extracellular electron transfer (Flexer et al, 2013;Yuan et al, 2019), offer a large active area for mediator reduction (Wu et al, 2018), and even promote microbial growth with great excretion of electron mediators (Zou et al, 2017) but, at the level of microbial cells, they should be considered as surface functionalization (Zou et al 2017;Yuan et al, 2019) or surface structuring (Zou et al, 2017) rather than porosity. Hierarchical porous structures are promising electrode architectures, at the crossroads of cell-level porosity and nano-structured surfaces.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most cases, hierarchical structures used to form microbial anodes are based on the association of a macro-porous structure, which corresponds to the types of structure dealt with in this review, and a nano-structure, which can be obtained in various ways, including by using carbon nanotubes (Zhao et al, 2011;Flexer et al 2013) or nano-porous graphene (Qiao et al, 2014). These nano-structures can promote bacterial attachment and extracellular electron transfer (Flexer et al, 2013;Yuan et al, 2019), offer a large active area for mediator reduction (Wu et al, 2018), and even promote microbial growth with great excretion of electron mediators (Zou et al, 2017) but, at the level of microbial cells, they should be considered as surface functionalization (Zou et al 2017;Yuan et al, 2019) or surface structuring (Zou et al, 2017) rather than porosity. Hierarchical porous structures are promising electrode architectures, at the crossroads of cell-level porosity and nano-structured surfaces.…”
Section: Perspectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2 demonstrates the advantages and disadvantages of MFC. Recently, nanotechnology or use of nanomaterial has revolutionized the fabrication of components of MFC to improve the performance and efficacy of traditional MFC in terms of electron conductivity, power density, cost, thermal stability, ORR rate and anti-corrosion [94,95], particularly the modification of electrodes (anode and cathode) by nanomaterials. This is because the materials used in the production of electrodes that are the major constituent of MFC are essential to determine the overall performance of MFC [96].…”
Section: Modification Of Mfc Components With Nanomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…c). First, this action can be accomplished by increasing the porosity of the anode or its surface layer, which represents a specific area of material science . Second, a porous structure can be created in a number of ways by coating the electrode with a polymeric layer, usually consisting of several components, to significantly improve the bacterial adhesion significantly , .…”
Section: Immobilization and Redox Mediator‐based Strategies For Enhanmentioning
confidence: 99%