2021
DOI: 10.1021/acs.analchem.1c02102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanopore Stochastic Sensing Based on Non-covalent Interactions

Abstract: A variety of species could be detected by using nanopores engineered with various recognition sites based upon non-covalent interactions, including electrostatic, aromatic, and hydrophobic interactions. The existence of these engineered non-covalent bonding sites was supported by the single-channel recording technique. The advantage of the non-covalent interaction-based sensing strategy was that the recognition site of the engineered nanopore was not specific for a particular molecule but instead selective fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even so, various types of biological nanopores have been engineered for studying peptide translocation, analysing peptide interactions and controlling single protein/peptide capture and translocation through non-covalent interactions. 10–15 Wild-type aerolysin (WT AeL) has shown an excellent ability to discriminate amino acids from short peptides with the help of a charged polyarginine carrier, which holds promise for peptide sequencing. But WT AeL hardly provides effective ionic current responses to all heterogeneously charged peptides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even so, various types of biological nanopores have been engineered for studying peptide translocation, analysing peptide interactions and controlling single protein/peptide capture and translocation through non-covalent interactions. 10–15 Wild-type aerolysin (WT AeL) has shown an excellent ability to discriminate amino acids from short peptides with the help of a charged polyarginine carrier, which holds promise for peptide sequencing. But WT AeL hardly provides effective ionic current responses to all heterogeneously charged peptides.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protein nanopores have already been utilized to identify single amino acids and protein–protein interactions by amperometric recognition. Peptides with post-translational modifications are recognized by nanopore-based approaches, to the extent that the sensing principle relies on volume exclusion. , Moreover, the inter-molecule interaction between the target peptides and the nanopore interface can lead to characteristic ionic current patterns for discriminating amino acids with similar volumes. , The nanopore-based single molecule approach has demonstrated the possibility of sensing chiral molecules by designing a specific chiral environment, but the generalization of such a strategy toward peptide-containing chiral amino acid is lacking. Previous nanopore-based tools remain insufficient in identifying amino acids in peptides with identical volumes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…electrostatic, aromatic, and hydrophobic interactions) in the α-HL nanopore, Chen et al can detect various molecules based on their ionic current signal. 47 Therefore, based on previous studies, we tried to use MD simulation in a microscopic view to explore the correlation between non-covalent interaction and ionic current blockage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%