2019
DOI: 10.1101/571364
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanopore sequencing for fast determination of plasmids, phages, virulence markers, and antimicrobial resistance genes in Shiga toxin-producingEscherichia coli

Abstract: 1Whole genome sequencing can provide essential public health information. However, it is now 2 known that widely used short-read methods have the potential to miss some randomly-3 distributed segments of genomes. This can prevent phages, plasmids, and virulence factors 4 from being detected or properly identified. Here, we compared assemblies of three complete 5 STEC O26:H11 genomes from two different sequence types (ST21 and 29), each acquired 6 using the MiSeq-Nextera XT, MinION nanopore-based sequencing, an… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both LSKv14 and RBKv14 had better read quality metrics than RBKv10, which agree with other studies 6,11,17,18 . While LSKv14 had higher Q-scores, the read length distribution for RBKv14 had a better representation of longer reads in the RBKv14 datasets, whereas the LSKv14 read size was skewed towards shorter reads, which has been observed previously with older kit/flowcell versions (SQK-LSK108 & SQK-RAD002 on R9.4.1 flow cells) 12,13 . We detected low proportions of duplex reads from RBKv14 (average 0.33 %) and LSKv14 (average 5.6 %); this agrees agree with 18 who found the proportion of duplex reads with LSKv14 was < 7 % for each isolate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Both LSKv14 and RBKv14 had better read quality metrics than RBKv10, which agree with other studies 6,11,17,18 . While LSKv14 had higher Q-scores, the read length distribution for RBKv14 had a better representation of longer reads in the RBKv14 datasets, whereas the LSKv14 read size was skewed towards shorter reads, which has been observed previously with older kit/flowcell versions (SQK-LSK108 & SQK-RAD002 on R9.4.1 flow cells) 12,13 . We detected low proportions of duplex reads from RBKv14 (average 0.33 %) and LSKv14 (average 5.6 %); this agrees agree with 18 who found the proportion of duplex reads with LSKv14 was < 7 % for each isolate.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…Rapid-based workflows result in longer read lengths and are quick to perform which makes it preferable for time-sensitive analyses (e.g. outbreak investigation), whereas Ligation workflows require more hands-on time but result in greater data yield 12,13 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%