2016
DOI: 10.1039/c6ra00398b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoparticles and mesenchymal stem cells: a win-win alliance for anticancer drug delivery

Abstract: Schematic illustration of the combination of NPs and MSCs drug delivery systems for cancer therapy.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 124 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the literature, a pathway, involving CXCR4 and its ligand stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), is the main axis in MSCs and cancer cell cross-talk and stem cell mobilization to tumors . Yet, ex vivo- cultivated MSCs tend to lose the marker due to changes in the microenvironment and the shift from 3D to 2D space, which is confirmed by our results of low CXCR4 expression (Figure B). Nevertheless, there are multiple other pathways responsible for MSC migration, including but not limited to the vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor and their respective receptors, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) paired with the C–C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) and cellular adhesion molecules, and other signaling pathways …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the literature, a pathway, involving CXCR4 and its ligand stromal-derived factor-1 (SDF-1), is the main axis in MSCs and cancer cell cross-talk and stem cell mobilization to tumors . Yet, ex vivo- cultivated MSCs tend to lose the marker due to changes in the microenvironment and the shift from 3D to 2D space, which is confirmed by our results of low CXCR4 expression (Figure B). Nevertheless, there are multiple other pathways responsible for MSC migration, including but not limited to the vascular endothelial growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor and their respective receptors, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) paired with the C–C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) and cellular adhesion molecules, and other signaling pathways …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UMSCs have been reported to possess tumor-homing activity [37][38][39] . The CXCR4 and CCR2 expressed on UMSCs can interact with overexpressed SDF-1α and MCP-1 in GBM [40][41][42] , thus providing tumorhoming tropism 38,43,44 . Moreover, after activation by SDF-1α, VLA-4 on the surface of UMSCs can interact with VCAM-1 adhesion molecules and β1 integrin on endothelial cells of the BBB and aid penetration of the barrier by rolling and migration to achieve intracranial Gd agent delivery [45][46][47] .…”
Section: Gbm Homing Features Of Snsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another MSCs drug delivery strategy is to combine them with nanoparticles (NP). Nanoparticles are used to introduce genetic modification in MSCs by replacing viral vectors, stimulating their proliferation and migration, and what is more, protecting them against the cytotoxic effects of the drugs carried, or controlled drug release [20]. Mathilde et al studied MSCs as carriers of NPs in brain tumours.…”
Section: Msc-based Drug Delivery Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%