2022
DOI: 10.1109/rbme.2020.3035273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoparticle Enhanced Optical Biosensing Technologies for Prostate Specific Antigen Biomarker Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,10,11 Moreover, in the early stages of PCa, the tumor is not large, it is still difficult to accurately determine the tumor even if the method of "DRE combined with PSA" is adopted, thus causing deterioration of the disease. 7,12 Therefore, there is an urgent need to find more reliable and specific biomarkers to detect PCa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,10,11 Moreover, in the early stages of PCa, the tumor is not large, it is still difficult to accurately determine the tumor even if the method of "DRE combined with PSA" is adopted, thus causing deterioration of the disease. 7,12 Therefore, there is an urgent need to find more reliable and specific biomarkers to detect PCa.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,7 PSA testing is by far the predominant screening method; Unfortunately, other diseases in the body, such as Benign Prostate Hyperplasia (BPH) and Acute Bacteria Prostatitis (ABP), can also cause elevated PSA levels in the serum, resulting in a high level of false positive test results. 8 At the same time, the PSA test has a 15% false-negative result, which causes patients to miss the best time for treatment. 9,10 In 2009, Sreekumar et al discovered that sarcosine could be used as a characteristic biomarker for PCa, [11][12][13] providing a new approach for the early detection of this disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%