2017
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b04163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoparticle-Delivered 2-PAM for Rat Brain Protection against Paraoxon Central Toxicity

Abstract: Solid lipid nanoparticles (SLNs) are among the most promising nanocarriers to target the blood-brain barrier (BBB) for drug delivery to the central nervous system (CNS). Encapsulation of the acetylcholinesterase reactivator, pralidoxime chloride (2-PAM), in SLNs appears to be a suitable strategy for protection against poisoning by organophosphorus agents (OPs) and postexposure treatment. 2-PAM-loaded SLNs were developed for brain targeting and delivery via intravenous (iv) administration. 2-PAM-SLNs displayed … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(108 reference statements)
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy between experimental measurements and theoretical loading might be mainly related to the use of generic force fields (UFF in particular), not specifically developed for such precise applications, as well as the presence of the impregnation solvent (i.e., methanol), which competes with 2-PAM for adsorption within the MIL-125-NH 2 pores. Although the 2-PAM loading capacity of MIL-125-NH 2 is lower than in solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN; 30.8% w / w ) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (PLGA; 7.1–68.8% w / w ), the loading rate is in the same range than the previously reported liposome system (5.3–11.9% w / w ) [ 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Nevertheless, the photocatalytic activity of MIL-125-NH 2 could be an important advantage in simultaneously degrading nerve agents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The discrepancy between experimental measurements and theoretical loading might be mainly related to the use of generic force fields (UFF in particular), not specifically developed for such precise applications, as well as the presence of the impregnation solvent (i.e., methanol), which competes with 2-PAM for adsorption within the MIL-125-NH 2 pores. Although the 2-PAM loading capacity of MIL-125-NH 2 is lower than in solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN; 30.8% w / w ) and poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (PLGA; 7.1–68.8% w / w ), the loading rate is in the same range than the previously reported liposome system (5.3–11.9% w / w ) [ 16 , 17 , 18 ]. Nevertheless, the photocatalytic activity of MIL-125-NH 2 could be an important advantage in simultaneously degrading nerve agents.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Particularly, incorporation of 2-PAM into different nanocarriers has been proposed to overcome the previously mentioned drawback [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Although mesoporous silica and solid lipid NPs have shown promising results, the problem is far from being solved [ 18 ]. Apart from the potential delivery of 2-PAM into the brain, sustained release of 2-PAM into the bloodstream could lead to pharmaceutically relevant blood levels of the drug for prolonged periods of time, which would be beneficial in case of intoxication by more persistent agents such as VX (ethyl({2-[bis(propan-2-yl)amino]ethyl}sulfanyl)(methyl)phosphinate) [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To overcome the above-mentioned issues and to benefit from their biological activities, nanoparticles have been proposed to load EOs for therapeutic use [7,9,30]. Nanoparticles have the advantages of site-specific targeted delivery of bioactive molecules, improving their bioavailability with minimal toxicological events [29,31]. Among different types of nanoparticles, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and nanostructured lipid carriers (NLC) have a special interest due to their lipid composition and solid matrix [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…cm -1 in 0.0025 M phosphate buffer at pH = 7.4) The parameters were calculated against appropriate calibration curve, using the following equation[34]:…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%