2013
DOI: 10.1248/bpb.b13-00015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoparticle-Based Passive Drug Targeting to Tumors: Considerations and Implications for Optimization

Abstract: There are many potential barriers to the effective delivery of small-molecule drugs to solid tumors. Most small-molecule chemotherapeutic drugs have a large volume of distribution upon intravenous administration, which is often associated with a narrow therapeutic index due to their high level of toxicity in healthy tissues. Nanoparticle-based therapeutics for tumor targeting have emerged as one of the promising approaches to overcome the lack of tissue specificity of conventional chemotherapeutic drugs. Vario… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Overall, TDP-A-loaded targeted micelles were the most effective in retarding tumor growth among the various groups studied including TDP-A-loaded non-targeted micelles and free TDP-A. This observation can be largely contributed to the fact that the TDP-A-loaded, OCT-conjugated NET-targeting unimolecular micelles have both passive (via the EPR effect [45,46]) and active (via OCT conjugation) tumor targeting abilities [4749]. In contrast, the TDP-A-loaded non-targeted unimolecular micelles only have passive tumor targeting ability, while free TDP-A does not have any specific tumor targeting ability resulting in high in vivo systemic toxicity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Overall, TDP-A-loaded targeted micelles were the most effective in retarding tumor growth among the various groups studied including TDP-A-loaded non-targeted micelles and free TDP-A. This observation can be largely contributed to the fact that the TDP-A-loaded, OCT-conjugated NET-targeting unimolecular micelles have both passive (via the EPR effect [45,46]) and active (via OCT conjugation) tumor targeting abilities [4749]. In contrast, the TDP-A-loaded non-targeted unimolecular micelles only have passive tumor targeting ability, while free TDP-A does not have any specific tumor targeting ability resulting in high in vivo systemic toxicity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, using this strategy, passive accumulation of the DDS in the tumor environment can be achieved, which is called the enhanced permeability and retention effect. 22 , 23 Furthermore, targeted delivery of the drug can be achieved by several receptors overexpressed on some tumor cells, such as asialoglycoproteins, 24 transferrin, 25 integrin receptors 26 , 27 and folate. 28 …”
Section: Potential Strategies To Enhance Chemotherapy By 5-fumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Targeting is achieved through either active or passive means. Active targeting (Nag and Delehanty, 2019) involves a specific ligand functionalized to the nanoparticle exterior that binds to receptors that are overexpressed in the outer cell membrane of cells of the target tissue and passive targeting involves global properties (Ogawara et al, 2013) of the nanoparticle that lead to a greater percentage becoming lodged in the target tissue in comparison to other tissues. An example of passive targeting is what is referred to as the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect (Maeda et al, 2013); liposomes can be designed to take advantage of the leaky vasculature of tumor tissue to become preferentially lodged there; PEGylation is a common means to achieve this.…”
Section: Nanoparticle Design and Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%