2004
DOI: 10.1021/la0489559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomechanics of the Formation of DNA Self-Assembled Monolayers and Hybridization on Microcantilevers

Abstract: Biomolecular interactions over the surface of a microcantilever can produce its bending motion via changes of the surface stress, which is referred to nanomechanical response. Here, we have studied the interaction forces responsible for the bending motion during the formation of a self-assembled monolayer of thiolated 27-mer single-stranded DNA on the gold-coated side of a microcantilever and during the subsequent hybridization with the complementary nucleic acid. The immobilization of the single-stranded DNA … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
87
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
87
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Early reports on experiments gave high immobilization densities in the range of 0.13-0.17 chains/nm 2 ; 12,27 the displacement predictions corresponding to these densities are compared to reported experimental measurements 5,6,11,12,23 in Table II. In order to simplify comparison across different experiments, the predicted and measured displacements in the table are multiplied with the square of the aspect ratio h l À Á 2 of the cantilever used in the experiment.…”
Section: Comparison Of Numerical Prediction With Experimental Rementioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Early reports on experiments gave high immobilization densities in the range of 0.13-0.17 chains/nm 2 ; 12,27 the displacement predictions corresponding to these densities are compared to reported experimental measurements 5,6,11,12,23 in Table II. In order to simplify comparison across different experiments, the predicted and measured displacements in the table are multiplied with the square of the aspect ratio h l À Á 2 of the cantilever used in the experiment.…”
Section: Comparison Of Numerical Prediction With Experimental Rementioning
confidence: 87%
“…They predicted possibilities of adsorbate detection of the order of picograms and immediately followed up with another study, in which they detected mercury adsorption on cantilever from mercury vapor in air with picogram resolution. 1,2 Since these initial reports, microcantilever-based sensors have been investigated for sensing of chemicals, 3,4 DNA hybridization, [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] explosives, [13][14][15] biomolecules, [16][17][18][19] and markers for cancer. [20][21][22] DNA hybridization is a simple and prominent example of biomolecular recognition and detection, since it is fundamental to most biological processes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13 The second application is relevant for chemical and biological sensings, in which selective binding of a substance on a previously sensitized cantilever side produces a cantilever bending due to the differential surface stress between opposite cantilever sides. [14][15][16][17][18] In both applications, cantilevers with high lengthto-thickness ratio are used due to the low spring constant. The ultimate sensitivity is determined by the thermomechanical noise that manifests as the Brownian motion of the cantilever.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Artifacts complicate protocols 7 and extend processing time. We use an array of nanomechanical microcantilevers for surface stress sensing based on atomic force microscopy 8 to analyze DNA/DNA hybridization [9][10][11][12] . The technique was further adapted to reveal antigen/antibody 13,14 , transcription factor/DNA interactions 15 and effects of antibiotics on bacteria 16 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%