2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11664-019-07758-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomechanical Responses of an Intermetallic Compound Layer in Transient Liquid Phase Bonding Using Indium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it has to be considered that the mechanical properties of the Cu 3 Sn and Cu 6 Sn 5 strongly depend on the crystal orientation [7,12,14,65]. Besides, the strain rate can considerably affect the Young's modulus, elastic modulus and hardness values [93,94]. In the current study, the elastic modulus, Young's modulus, and hardness of Cu 6 Sn 5 were found to increase as the Co content in the Cu 6 Sn 5 IMC increases.…”
Section: Nano-indentation Testmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…However, it has to be considered that the mechanical properties of the Cu 3 Sn and Cu 6 Sn 5 strongly depend on the crystal orientation [7,12,14,65]. Besides, the strain rate can considerably affect the Young's modulus, elastic modulus and hardness values [93,94]. In the current study, the elastic modulus, Young's modulus, and hardness of Cu 6 Sn 5 were found to increase as the Co content in the Cu 6 Sn 5 IMC increases.…”
Section: Nano-indentation Testmentioning
confidence: 50%
“…The magnified cross-sectional images given in Figure 10 a,b indicate that, for Cu 6 Sn 5 /Cu 3 Sn, the main crack propagated mostly within the upper Cu 6 Sn 5 , while as to (Cu,Ni) 6 Sn 5 /(Ni,Cu) 3 Sn 4 , the crack passed along the interface between (Cu,Ni) 6 Sn 5 and (Ni,Cu) 3 Sn 4 . This inconsistency could be referred to geometrical discontinuity and mechanical discontinuity of the bi-layer IMCs, sketched in Figure 10 c. With respect to Cu 6 Sn 5 /Cu 3 Sn, the E/H values for Cu 6 Sn 5 (18.84) and Cu 3 Sn (22.22) [ 12 ] did not diverge too much, therefore the crack propagated within Cu 6 Sn 5 , which showed scallop appearance and exhibited many stress concentration sites. In contrast, a significant E/H difference between (Cu,Ni) 6 Sn 5 (18.45) and (Ni,Cu) 3 Sn 4 (32.17) caused discontinuity in IMC mechanical behavior, thereby giving rise to cracking in-between those two phases and inferior impact resistance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies have been devoted to the mechanical behavior of IMCs in solder joints. Effects of alloying, growth texture, allotropic transition, crystal structure and compositions of IMCS were well studied [7,[9][10][11][12][13]. However, the relationships between IMC mechanical properties and solder joint reliability have not been systematically investigated yet.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…During the solder joint fabrication process, the Ag-based UBM tends to readily dissolve in the In-based solder, eventually bringing about the formation of a very thin Ag 9 In 4 intermetallic compound (IMC) layer [12]. Song et al [13] investigated the phase evolution of Ag-In phase IMCs that are obtained from isothermal reactions between In and Ag substrate metal. They indicated that the first emerging IMC phase was AgIn 2 , but it eventually and completely turned into Ag 9 In 4 after heating for 30 min at 180 • C. As a result, Ag 9 In 4 is the primary IMC phase among the Ag-In phase IMCs [13][14][15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%