2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2014.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomechanical properties of poly(para-phenylene vinylene) determined using quasi-static and dynamic nanoindentation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4(a). At 25 C, the reduced modulus of PPV is 4.4 ± 0.09 GPa, as reported previously [8]. As the test temperature was increased, there was an overall decrease in the reduced modulus values [see Fig.…”
Section: Quasi-static and Dynamic Nanoindentation Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…4(a). At 25 C, the reduced modulus of PPV is 4.4 ± 0.09 GPa, as reported previously [8]. As the test temperature was increased, there was an overall decrease in the reduced modulus values [see Fig.…”
Section: Quasi-static and Dynamic Nanoindentation Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…PPV films were prepared on glass substrates using solution casting and thermolytic conversion of the poly [p-phenylene (tetrahydrothiophenium)ethylene chloride] (PPTHEC) polymer, as reported previously [8,23]. The concentration of the precursor polymer (PPTHTEC) in the solution used for casting the films was about 0.7 wt%.…”
Section: Sample Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The mechanical properties of the PPV and PA films were determined by quasistatic and dynamic nanoindentation, using a previously reported procedure . PPV and PA films were cast on glass slides and converted under vacuum, at 250 and 200 °C, respectively, for 1 h. The nanoindentation tests were performed with a standard diamond Berkovich tip, using a load‐controlled ramp function with an 80 μN s –1 loading and unloading rate, a 400 μN peak load with a holding period of 2 s.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%