2020
DOI: 10.1039/d0cs00318b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomechanical mapping of soft materials with the atomic force microscope: methods, theory and applications

Abstract: This review provides an introduction to the state-of-the-art force microscope methods to map at high-spatial resolution the elastic and viscoelastic properties of proteins, polymers and cells.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
311
0
3

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 305 publications
(330 citation statements)
references
References 352 publications
(568 reference statements)
4
311
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple geometrical considerations led to the conclusion that such a change in tilt angle would result in ~0.6 nm thinning of the membrane. According to AFM data, the membrane thinning was found to be ~1.0 nm; however, it should be noted that tip-sample interaction during AFM imaging results in elastic deformation of the soft film [ 33 ]. Consequently, the bilayer is slightly compressed under the tip load, which in turn gives underestimated values of the thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple geometrical considerations led to the conclusion that such a change in tilt angle would result in ~0.6 nm thinning of the membrane. According to AFM data, the membrane thinning was found to be ~1.0 nm; however, it should be noted that tip-sample interaction during AFM imaging results in elastic deformation of the soft film [ 33 ]. Consequently, the bilayer is slightly compressed under the tip load, which in turn gives underestimated values of the thickness.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, AFM has demonstrated its superiority over SICM in terms of imaging resolution 38 . AFM is also more versatile in terms of retrieving information about the nanomechanical sample properties 39 and can even be used for molecular-specific imaging 40 . Due to the fragile nature of the glass nanocapillary, SICM is less forgiving of imaging mistakes that can lead to fracture of the capillary.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2-7 to interpret F vs. d and extract Young's modulus E by fitting the AFM experimental data. Several reviews are focused on the selection of correct contact mechanics model (interested readers can retrieve extensive information in [17,36,37]), here we want to focus on the operational routine to extract Young's Modulus, addressing its justification and pointing the direction to alternative models if needed.…”
Section: Contact Mechanics Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An AFM consists of a probe supported by an elastic cantilever that applies a vertical force at a defined speed on target sample while detecting the reaction force with pN level sensitivity. Mathematical models of contact mechanics between the AFM probe and the cell are required to interpret and quantify data derived from AFM indentation on living cells [16,17]. Indentation at low speed (frequency of events ≈ 1 Hz) is considered quasi-static and providing a wealth of information such as surface positioning, reaction force and probe-surface bonding force, in turn, converted in morphology, Young's modulus map and adhesion map.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%