2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2015.04.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanomaterials: Science and applications in the lithium–sulfur battery

Abstract: Reliable and cost-effective technologies for electrical energy storage are in great demand in sectors of the global economy ranging from portable devices, transportation, and sustainable production of electricity from intermittent sources. Among the various electrochemical energy storage options under consideration, rechargeable lithium-sulfur (Li-S) batteries remain the most promising platform for reversibly storing large amounts of electrical energy at moderate cost set by the inherent cell chemistry. The su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
223
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 328 publications
(224 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
0
223
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[4][5][6] But the commercial application of Li-S batteries is hindered by several inherent issues, including the poor electrical conductivity of sulfur, the large volume expansion (about 80%) during the charge process, and the loss of active mass in the cathode due to the dissolution of lithium polysuldes in the electrolyte and the shuttle effect.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[4][5][6] But the commercial application of Li-S batteries is hindered by several inherent issues, including the poor electrical conductivity of sulfur, the large volume expansion (about 80%) during the charge process, and the loss of active mass in the cathode due to the dissolution of lithium polysuldes in the electrolyte and the shuttle effect.…”
Section: -3mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…200 mAh/g for LiNi 0.8 Co 0.15 Al 0.05 O 2 (NCA)) in use within today's lithium-ion batteries (LIBs). [3][4][5] When paired with a lithium metal anode, which also boasts more than 10-fold improvement in theoretical specific capacity (3800 mAh/g) relative to the graphitic carbon anode (360 mAh/g) used in LIBs, the sulfur cathode becomes legitimately one of the most important conversion cathodes because it enables a battery technology with exceptional specific energy per unit mass (2600 Wh/kg) or unit volume (2800Wh/L). [6][7][8] Other attributes of the Li-S cell, including the low cost of the active cathode material and the spontaneous nature of the electrochemical conversion reactions in the cathode, which do not require a catalyst, have been amply discussed in several excellent recent reviews.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[6][7][8] Other attributes of the Li-S cell, including the low cost of the active cathode material and the spontaneous nature of the electrochemical conversion reactions in the cathode, which do not require a catalyst, have been amply discussed in several excellent recent reviews. 3,5,9 Here we focus on molecular engineering strategies that can be used to overcome the major obstacles within Li-S batteries, such as the poor conductivity of sulfur and its discharge products, and the large volume contraction and expansion of sulfur that accompanies its redox reaction with lithium, 5,9 that impede realization of commercial Li-S cells that live up to the potential of this battery chemistry. Of particular interest is the inherently complex physical chemistry of solid state and solvated lithium polysulfide (LiPS) species that lead to a variety of debilitating traits in Li-S cells, including high rates of self-discharge, poor capacity retention and fading over many cycles of charge and discharge, passivation of the lithium metal anode by dissolved sulfur species, and low cell efficiency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to increase the energy density of LIB, researchers focus on developing electrode materials with high specific capacity that may involve charging to increased upper cutoff potentials. 2,3 Several methods have been investigated to allow LIB to use higher cutoff potentials without compromising their lifetime. Sun et al 4 and Hu et al 5 showed that AlF 3 or ZrO 2 -coatings improved the rate capability, cycling stability and interface stability for Li [ Alternative solvents are another way of extending the potential operating range for LIB.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%