2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoindentation of high performance semicrystalline polymers: A case study on PEEK

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The experimental results, including the indentation hardness, indentation modulus, and plane strain modulus, are listed in Table 3. A smaller indentation depth of composite materials in nanoindentation tests generally indicates better nanomechanical properties under the same load conditions [48]. As illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Nanomechanical Properties Of Na-mmt/pes/ Ptfe Ternary Composmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The experimental results, including the indentation hardness, indentation modulus, and plane strain modulus, are listed in Table 3. A smaller indentation depth of composite materials in nanoindentation tests generally indicates better nanomechanical properties under the same load conditions [48]. As illustrated in Fig.…”
Section: Nanomechanical Properties Of Na-mmt/pes/ Ptfe Ternary Composmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…In this study, since the volume percentage of CNF is very small, the effect of thermal coefficient mismatch between LDPE and CNF is negligible. Moreover, it was previously found that mechanical polishing has no effect on the measured NI values for polymer composites [36,37]. Therefore, having the knowledge that all the CNF/LDPE samples in this study underwent the same thermal processing conditions and have no plastic deformation, and more importantly, all the indentations were performed on a plane surface parallel to the longitudinal central plane of the dog bone samples (i.e., a plane on which thermal history is virtually identical).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nanoindentation measurements were performed on an iMicro nanoindenter (NANOMECHANICS, Inc.) equipped with a Berkovich tip. To evaluate the hardness of PEEK as a function of indentation depth, the continuous stiffness measurement (CSM) technique [39][40][41] was employed by applying a small, sinusoidally varying signal on top of a DC signal driving the indenter. The hardness at each indentation depth is determined by analyzing the response of amplitude and phase.…”
Section: Nanoindentation Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all tests, hardness showed high values at indentation depth values <0.5 µm. These values are thought to be attributed to a phenomenon known as indentation size effect (ISE), and not regarded as physically significant because they are distorted by the inadequacies in the procedures applied to provide corrections for the imperfections in the tip geometry [41,47,48].…”
Section: Nanoindentation Investigations Of Peek Hardnessmentioning
confidence: 99%