Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge 2013
DOI: 10.1145/2460296.2460328
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanogenetic learning analytics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tactics that lead to success can also be discovered with cluster analysis (Sharples and Domingue 2016).  Importance of understanding learners' characteristics: students with different learning characteristics may exhibit different learning behaviors (Liu et al 2016), for instance, different exploration strategies (Martin et al 2013) or, in some cases, their age and gender (Wallner and Kriglstein 2015). It is key to model students for effective adaptive instruction (Koedinger, McLaughlin, and Stamper 2012), for instance, self-regulated learners tend to make better use of in-game curricular resources and may be more deliberate in their actions (Sabourin et al 2013) and high-performance students tend to use tools more appropriately (Liu et al 2015).…”
Section: Results On Assessment and Student Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tactics that lead to success can also be discovered with cluster analysis (Sharples and Domingue 2016).  Importance of understanding learners' characteristics: students with different learning characteristics may exhibit different learning behaviors (Liu et al 2016), for instance, different exploration strategies (Martin et al 2013) or, in some cases, their age and gender (Wallner and Kriglstein 2015). It is key to model students for effective adaptive instruction (Koedinger, McLaughlin, and Stamper 2012), for instance, self-regulated learners tend to make better use of in-game curricular resources and may be more deliberate in their actions (Sabourin et al 2013) and high-performance students tend to use tools more appropriately (Liu et al 2015).…”
Section: Results On Assessment and Student Profilingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As for the other observed phenomena, the analysis and application of Learning Processes was present in the research by Martin, T. et al (2013) and Peddycord-Liu, Z. et al (2017), while the research by Callaghan, MJ. et al (2014), Vahldick, A. et al (2017) and Flores R.L.…”
Section: Q1: What Educational Phenomena Does the Research Intend To Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Cluster Analysis technique was present in 5 of the 14 studies, which is equivalent to about 36% of them, being used mainly to analyze the Learning Processes [Martin, T. et al, 2013;Peddycord-Liu, Z. et al, 2017] and Student Performance [Feng, X. & Yamada, M., 2019;Niemelä, M. et al, 2020], also being present in a study that sought to analyze the Problem Solving [Vahdat, M. et al, 2016].…”
Section: Q2: What Techniques / Algorithms Are Used To Analyze the Datmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first works of Learning Analytics focused on the traces that were automatically generated when learners interacted with some type of digital learning tool. For example, Kizilcec, Piech, and Schneider [21] used the log of the actions performed by different groups of students in massive open online courses (MOOCs) to study course engagement, or Martin et al [26] that use the low-level actions of students playing an educational video game study learning strategies. While these tools fulfill the goal of Learning Analytics, if we only focus on a single type of traces that are recorded in logs of digital tools, we risk oversimplifying the process of learning or even worse, misunderstanding the traces due to the lack of contextual information, two of the main critiques directed towards Learning Analytics from the educational research community [36].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%