2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.11.073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanog inhibits the switch of myogenic cells towards the osteogenic lineage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alkaline phosphatase activity was performed as previously described. 52 Colony number was determine using Image-Pro Plus analysis software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA). Further characterization and verification of the nature of the reprogrammed clones were performed by QRT-PCR as described below in detail.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alkaline phosphatase activity was performed as previously described. 52 Colony number was determine using Image-Pro Plus analysis software (Media Cybernetics, Rockville, MD, USA). Further characterization and verification of the nature of the reprogrammed clones were performed by QRT-PCR as described below in detail.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For osteogenesis, MEFs were grown for a few days until subconfluence, then medium was changed to conditioned medium from 293T cells that secrete BMP-4 for the indicated time points. Alkaline Phospatase activity was detected as described [61].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is unclear whether the putative Nanog protein bands shown on Western blotting (WB), in which frequently only a cropped strip is shown, or the Nanog protein staining shown in immunohistochemistry (IHC) truly represent the Nanog protein. Finally , intriguingly, although the predicated molecular mass of Nanog protein (for both Nanog1 and NanogP8) is ∼35 kD, numerous studies have reported putative Nanog proteins migrating, on SDS-PAGE, at apparent molecular mass of 29 to 80 kD in ES, EC, and somatic cancer cells (Table 1)[2], [5], [17], [24][26], [46][59]. Even more puzzlingly, the same antibody often seems to detect different ‘Nanog’ protein bands (Table 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%