2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.047
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanofiltration of single and mixture solutions containing anionics and nonionic surfactants below their critical micelle concentrations (CMCs)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
31
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
31
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Kaya et. al [2] reported that membrane NF PES 10 (made of polyethersulfone, MWCO = 1000 Da) was more fouled than membrane N 30F (polyethersulfone, MWCO = 400 Da) during the non-ionic surfactant filtration. It should be mentioned that correlation between membrane pore size and micelle diameter/ monomer length affects process efficiency.…”
Section: Transport Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Kaya et. al [2] reported that membrane NF PES 10 (made of polyethersulfone, MWCO = 1000 Da) was more fouled than membrane N 30F (polyethersulfone, MWCO = 400 Da) during the non-ionic surfactant filtration. It should be mentioned that correlation between membrane pore size and micelle diameter/ monomer length affects process efficiency.…”
Section: Transport Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hydrophilic part enables molecule to solubilize in polar liquids, while the hydrophobic portion allows the solubilisation in nonpolar liquids. Depending on the hydrophilic unit charge, surfactants are classified into four groups: nonionic (0), anionic (-), cationic (+) and amphoteric (±) [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If surfactants are below their critical micelle concentration (CMC) they will not be retained by any of these techniques, but if they are above CMC, MF and UF techniques retain these components and the permeate stream will lose its cleaning properties. Some works based on NF processes with the aim of surfactants recovery in the permeate stream have been published in the last years (Boussu et al, 2007, Forstmeier et al, 2002Kaya et al, 2006Kaya et al, , 2009. In those cases permeate flux and surfactant rejection are strongly dependent on the membrane material (membrane isoelectric point -IEP) and feed conditions (pH, concentration, etc.)…”
Section: Recovery Of Cleaning-in-place Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The removal efficiency of surfactant (CL80) from solutions containing 500-5,000 mg L -1 exceeded 94%. Kaya et al (2006) ) ranged from 46% to 93% for NF PES10 and XN 45, respectively. Korzenowski et al (2012) studied the effectiveness of FilmTec membranes (NF-90, NF-200 and NF-270) for removal of anionic surfactants (linear alkyl benzene sulfonate and sodium dodecylether sulfate) with a content of 430 mg L -1 from model solutions and detergent wastewater.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%