2011
DOI: 10.1021/bm201421g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanofibrous Microfiltration Membrane Based on Cellulose Nanowhiskers

Abstract: A multilayered nanofibrous microfiltration (MF) membrane system with high flux, low pressure drop, and high retention capability against both bacteria and bacteriophages (a virus model) was developed by impregnating ultrafine cellulose nanowhiskers (diameter about 5 nm) into an electrospun polyacrylonitrile (PAN) nanofibrous scaffold (fiber diameter about 150 nm) supported by a poly(ethylene terephthalate) (PET) nonwoven substrate (fiber diameter about 20 μm). The cellulose nanowhiskers were anchored on the PA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
136
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
3
136
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of MF, the infusion of the whiskers resulted in a reduction of the mean pore size with a narrower distribution than the electrospun PAN nanofibrous membrane. In comparison with the commercial membrane GS0.22 made of nitrocellulose and acetyl cellulose ester, the water flux cellulose nanowhiskerbased membrane was better because of the difference in porosity (>80% versus 52%) [144]. The mechanical properties were improved with Young's modulus and tensile strength values of 375±15 and 14.3±0.4 MPa, respectively, compared to the unmodified membrane (226±20 and 8.5±0.3 MPa) which was still higher than the commercial membrane with a tensile strength of 5.6±0.3 MPa.…”
Section: Cellulose Nanowhiskersmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In the case of MF, the infusion of the whiskers resulted in a reduction of the mean pore size with a narrower distribution than the electrospun PAN nanofibrous membrane. In comparison with the commercial membrane GS0.22 made of nitrocellulose and acetyl cellulose ester, the water flux cellulose nanowhiskerbased membrane was better because of the difference in porosity (>80% versus 52%) [144]. The mechanical properties were improved with Young's modulus and tensile strength values of 375±15 and 14.3±0.4 MPa, respectively, compared to the unmodified membrane (226±20 and 8.5±0.3 MPa) which was still higher than the commercial membrane with a tensile strength of 5.6±0.3 MPa.…”
Section: Cellulose Nanowhiskersmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The adsorption capacity was 16 times higher for the cellulose nanowhiskers-based membrane. The cellulose nanowhiskers as a thin barrier layer in TNFC displayed superior performance compared to the commercial known membranes [144]. The hydrophilicity, large surface area to volume ratio and the surface charges of the cellulose nanowhiskers played a significant role in improving the rejection and flux of the membrane.…”
Section: Cellulose Nanowhiskersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations