2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.9b19037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanoengineered Osteoinductive Bioink for 3D Bioprinting Bone Tissue

Abstract: Bioprinting is an emerging additive manufacturing approach to the fabrication of patient-specific, implantable three-dimensional (3D) constructs for regenerative medicine. However, developing cell-compatible bioinks with high printability, structural stability, biodegradability, and bioactive characteristics is still a primary challenge for translating 3D bioprinting technology to preclinical and clinal models. To overcome this challenge, we developed a nanoengineered ionic covalent entanglement (NICE) bioink … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
108
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
2
108
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, morphological and molecular characterization of osteogenic differentiation performed on BM-hMSCs cultured in a 3D aragonite-based bi-phasic osteochondral scaffold confirmed the active role played by the scaffold in supporting osteogenic differentiation and enhancing cell proliferation [21]. Chimene and colleague demonstrated the osteoinductive capability of 3D bioprinted scaffolds on hMSCs, analysing both nascent ECM and transcripts in the absence of osteoinducing agents [22]. Similar results were previously obtained analysing titania containing phosphate-based glasses.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Accordingly, morphological and molecular characterization of osteogenic differentiation performed on BM-hMSCs cultured in a 3D aragonite-based bi-phasic osteochondral scaffold confirmed the active role played by the scaffold in supporting osteogenic differentiation and enhancing cell proliferation [21]. Chimene and colleague demonstrated the osteoinductive capability of 3D bioprinted scaffolds on hMSCs, analysing both nascent ECM and transcripts in the absence of osteoinducing agents [22]. Similar results were previously obtained analysing titania containing phosphate-based glasses.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…A prerequisite for inks to be 3D printed into macroscopic complex structures is their shear-thinning behavior, which is a common property of bioinks [44,45] and jammed microgels. [46] To ensure a reproducible jamming of the microgels, we measure the solid polymer content of samples swollen in deionized water, as reported in Table S1, Supporting Information.…”
Section: Rheological Characterization Of Microgel Inksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a variety of bioink materials have been tested in additive manufacturing of bone-like scaffolds, demonstrating promising in vitro and in vivo osteoconductivity, such scaffold-based therapies have shown only a modest success in clinical applications [24,25]. This is mainly due to the lack of proper osteoconductive cues in the bioink, biomaterial-related infections, insufficient engraftment, and inadequate reproducibility and patient-specificity [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%