IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004.
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2004.1462606
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nanodosimetric cluster size distributions of therapeutic proton beams

Abstract: Abstract-As we move into the new millennium, it is important that we improve our understanding of radiation effects on humans and nanoelectronic systems. This understanding is essential in a number of areas including radiation therapy for cancer treatment and extended human presence in outer space. Nanodosimetry in low-pressure gases enables measurement of the energy deposition of ionizing radiation on a scale equivalent to the dimensions of the DNA molecule. This is extremely important for not only biological… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 shows that the distributions produced by the MC simulation are in satisfactory agreement with the experimental data for all particle kinds with the notable exception of electrons. The difference between experimental and simulation results for protons and alpha particles on average does not exceed 15% and can be attributed to both experimental statistical and systematic errors as well as to uncertainties in MC calculations as discussed in detail in (7,12). For electrons the difference is much bigger: more than 200% for non-zero cluster sizes at impact parameter values of 0 and 21 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 shows that the distributions produced by the MC simulation are in satisfactory agreement with the experimental data for all particle kinds with the notable exception of electrons. The difference between experimental and simulation results for protons and alpha particles on average does not exceed 15% and can be attributed to both experimental statistical and systematic errors as well as to uncertainties in MC calculations as discussed in detail in (7,12). For electrons the difference is much bigger: more than 200% for non-zero cluster sizes at impact parameter values of 0 and 21 nm.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A dedicated Monte Carlo (MC) particle track structure code (7,11,12) was used to simulate the experimental data. It utilizes a compilation of experimental ionization cross sections of protons and alpha particles, experimental electron interaction cross sections for elastic scattering, excitation, and ionization to transport primary high-energy protons, alpha-particles or electrons, as well as secondary electrons with energies down to 10 eV in propane.…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulation Of the Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since experimental data for a larger range of heavy ions and LET values are scarce, we performed Monte Carlo simulations of the experimental nanodosimetric data for protons, helium and carbon ions, as well as 100 keV electrons, the latter used as low-LET reference radiation. The Monte Carlo code developed at the PTB for that purpose has been extensively validated in comparison with experimental nanodosimetric data with protons and helium ions [10,13,14]. For heavier ions, the code remains to be validated as experimental data do not exist at this time.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ion clusters are then transformed into ion-signal pulse trains based on the experimentally measured location-vs.-drift time relationship. The code has been benchmarked against experimental data with good agreement [10,[13][14][15].…”
Section: Monte Carlo Simulation Of Nanodosimetric Datamentioning
confidence: 99%