“…Particularly, Ni-based materials have become a promising choice for constructing durable electrocatalysts owing to their earth abundance, high heat and electrical conductivities, low cost, and substantial thermal and chemical stabilities. Most importantly, their high capability to exist in different oxidation states (−1 to +4) leads to great susceptibility to undergo various electronic transitions. − Also, nickel foam (NF)-supported water oxidation catalysts are an emerging class of materials, as NF possesses a three-dimensional (3D) porous structure, large surface area, and high conductivity. − Meanwhile, as a branch of crystalline porous materials, metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have received momentous attention for a vast range of potential applications − because of their three-dimensional (3D) spanned architectures with assorted topology, regular and adjustable pores, potential for tailorability, and diversity of metal centers as well as functional groups. ,− MOFs have also become best choices for OER electrocatalysis because of their accessible voids and open channels that can accommodate space for electrolytes, facilitate diffusion of the reactants, and assist in transportation of the evolved oxygen gas. ,, Moreover, the homogeneously distributed and pore-directed metal centers in MOFs serve as potential active sites, while organic ligands can aid in swapping of redox features to neighboring metal ions via modifying their coordination mode . However, only a handful of examples persist where MOFs are directly employed as OER electrocatalysts, , which is primarily on account of their insufficient chemical stability and improper orientation of metal sites within the pores.…”