2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2021.111774
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nano-organic supports for enzyme immobilization: Scopes and perspectives

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
47
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Other characteristics that justify the use of nanofibers are the high adhesion capacity of enzymes with a homogeneous dispersion, less probability of denaturation and enzymatic dysfunctions, and less resistance to mass transfer. [27] Adsorption on electrospinning PAN membranes is the easiest and least expansive method of immobilization. However, despite providing high enzymatic retention on the support, it is less efficient than covalent binding, as the adsorbed enzymes are more likely to be gradually released with the reuse of the biocatalyst.…”
Section: R E C O R D R E V I E W T H E C H E M I C a L R E C O R Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other characteristics that justify the use of nanofibers are the high adhesion capacity of enzymes with a homogeneous dispersion, less probability of denaturation and enzymatic dysfunctions, and less resistance to mass transfer. [27] Adsorption on electrospinning PAN membranes is the easiest and least expansive method of immobilization. However, despite providing high enzymatic retention on the support, it is less efficient than covalent binding, as the adsorbed enzymes are more likely to be gradually released with the reuse of the biocatalyst.…”
Section: R E C O R D R E V I E W T H E C H E M I C a L R E C O R Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The materials considered as enzyme supports should be physically stable against mechanical deformations, possess many enzyme binding sites, be microbe resistant, biologically compatible, commercially available, and have a good cost-performance relation. 47 In addition, supports should provide a suitable microenvironment for catalysis after enzyme immobilization, which implies a good diffusion rate for both substrate and products, 48 as well as an easy way for the separation from the reaction media. 42 Supports may be classified into organic and inorganic materials; examples of organic supports are synthetic polymers, such as polypropylene and polyvinyl resin.…”
Section: Enzyme Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…39 For example, new hybrid nano-supports are attractive materials for the immobilization of enzymes that allows the formation of multienzyme biocatalytic systems applicable to environmental processes and food additive production. 48,49 Metalorganic frameworks (MOFs) are an example of porous nanomaterials that are good matrices for enzyme immobilization due to their high surface area and the possibility of easy pore size design. 50 In the future, the immobilization of multi-enzymes, along with cofactor regeneration and retention, could be gainfully exploited in the development of biochemical processes that involve complex chemical conversions.…”
Section: Enzyme Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Boosting the catalytic activity and operational stability of enzymes and facilitating their recovery and reuse, are considered the primary objectives of enzyme immobilization 1 , 2 . To take advantage of practical utilization of the immobilized enzymes, some contributing factors should be noticed, such as choosing the proper immobilization protocols and the appropriate support materials for minimizing the risks of subunit dissociation, deactivation, aggregation, autolysis, or leaching of the enzymes 3 5 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%