Abstract. This study was undertaken to assess bone regeneration using hydroxyapatite (HA) Hydroxyapatite (HA) is an alloplastic material commonly used as a bone graft substitute due to inherent bioactive properties that support osteo-conduction. However, a weakness of HA-based biomaterials is their slow degradation and absorption in vivo. The granulated form of calcium phosphate ceramics has a regenerative effect within an alveolar bone defect (1). HA is highly crystalline because of the sintering process and has a larger particle size than bone apatite due to grain growth. These large particles are highly resistant to biodegradation in the body, their osteo-conduction is very low, and they cannot be degraded by osteoclasts (2). The porous HA (pHA) scaffold has good bone regeneration in in vivo performance (3-5). This form of material requires proper size and three-dimensional porosity for demonstrating its intrinsic osteo-conductivity and osteogenic potential within limited and exiguous sites such as dental sockets. An HA scaffold with interconnected pore 300 μm in diameter has the most appropriate osteo-conductive capacity (6). Therefore, we hypothesized that HA types and crystallinity influence the rate of bone healing around alveolar sockets.Bone-filling materials undergo radiological evaluation through determination of the bone mineral density (BMD) and information about bone change. Quantitative radiographic evaluation using x-rays is used to assess bone structure and mechanical properties indirectly. In particular, quantitative computed tomography (CT), and peripheral CT are used in humans for monitoring and treatment of metabolic diseases, skeletal status, and osteoporosis (7,8). Micro-CT yields more information about bone mass and microstructure, and is used for studies of bone metabolism in animal models (9-11). Bone formation and mineralization will affect bone strength; mechanical stability depends on the amount and density of bone (12).The bone-regeneration ability of each bone substitute is evaluated compared to bone metabolic disorders model by BMD, percentage bone volume, and other bone structural parameters. Our study evaluated bone substitutes in the alveolar socket of mandibles of beagle dogs to determine BMD levels by CT and bone parameter values by micro-CT at different time points.In this study, osteogenic potential was compared, focusing on alveolar socket healing and restoration using granular HA (gHA) forms and porous HA (pHA) scaffolds. Tissue engineering methods were assessed by manufacturing functional, aesthetic HAs that would not affect adjacent tooth structures.
335